Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd. v. DGL Group, Ltd
| Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd. |
| DGL Group LTD |
| 1:2021cv05894 |
| October 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| James R Cho |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report by Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd. (Men, Ruoting) |
The Court is in receipt of Defendant's #18 notice of settlement. In light of settlement, the parties are ordered to file a stipulation of dismissal by Friday, December 17, 2021. If the parties do not arrive at a settlement agreement, they are ordered to file a status report by Monday, December 20, 2021. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 12/13/2021. (Ahn, Lois)
|
| Filing 18 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File opposition to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment by DGL Group LTD. (Kaufman, Benjamin) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin J. Kaufman on behalf of DGL Group LTD (aty to be noticed) (Kaufman, Benjamin) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Default Judgment Against Defendant DGL Group, Ltd by Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Ruoting Men's Decl. in support of Motion for Default Judgment, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit Summons, #4 Exhibit Executed Summons, #5 Exhibit Certificate of Default, #6 Exhibit Communication between Pl and Def, #7 Exhibit Order 16693 PO+PI, #8 Exhibit Order 17541 PO+PI, #9 Exhibit Order 19022 PO+PI, #10 Exhibit Order 19230 PO+PI, #11 Exhibit Filing Fee, #12 Exhibit Invoice for Service, #13 Memorandum in Support Memo in Support Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, #14 Proposed Judgment Proposed Judgment, #15 Affidavit Plaintiff Affirmation of Service) (Men, Ruoting) |
| Filing 15 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT It appearing from the docket maintained in this action that defendant DGL Group LTD has failed to appear or otherwise defend this action, the default of defendant DGL Group LTD is hereby noted pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Poveda, J.) |
| Filing 14 Request for Certificate of Default by Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration In Support Of Plaintiff's Request For Certificate Of Default, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Certificate Of Default) (Men, Ruoting) |
|
ORDER re DE #12 : Plaintiff's counsel shall seek a Clerk's entry of default on or before 12/1/2021. Within two weeks of entry of default counsel shall move for default judgment in accordance with the District Judge's Individual Rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 11/17/2021. (Gillespie, Saudia)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically Ordered by Clerk of Court on 11/16/2021. (Marziliano, August)
|
| Filing 12 STATUS REPORT by Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd. (Men, Ruoting) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically by Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd.. (Men, Ruoting) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd.. DGL Group LTD served on 10/25/2021, answer due 11/15/2021. (Liu, Tao) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Na Zhang on behalf of Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd. (notification declined or already on case) (Zhang, Na) |
|
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Na Zhang shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 10/28/2021. (Gillespie, Saudia)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14970246. by Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Certificate of Good Standing) (Zhang, Na) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to DGL Group LTD. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by He Cheng on behalf of Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd. (aty to be noticed) (Cheng, He) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Wei Yang on behalf of Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd. (aty to be noticed) (Yang, Wei) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Tao Liu on behalf of Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd. (aty to be noticed) (Liu, Tao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd against DGL Group LTD filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14960416 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Men, Ruoting) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd. v. DGL Group, Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shenzhen Tomoloo Technology Industrial Co.,Ltd. | |
| Represented By: | Ruoting Men |
| Represented By: | He Cheng |
| Represented By: | Tao Liu |
| Represented By: | Na Zhang |
| Represented By: | Wei Yang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DGL Group LTD | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Y. Kaufman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
