C.E. Towers LLC et al v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company
Plaintiff: C.E. Towers LLC and CET LLC
Defendant: Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2021cv06084
Filed: November 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: LaShann DeArcy Hall
Referring Judge: Ramon E Reyes
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER: Defendant's motion #9 for a pre-motion conference on its anticipated motion to dismiss as to Plaintiff CET LLC is DENIED. The parties shall brief Defendant's motion to dismiss in accordance with this Court's Individual Practices. Accordingly, Defendant shall serve Plaintiffs with its motion on or before January 7, 2022. Plaintiffs shall serve Defendant with opposition papers on or before January 21, 2022. Defendant shall serve Plaintiffs with its reply, if any, and file the fully briefed motion by January 28, 2022. As a courtesy, unless objected to by the parties, the Court asks that the parties file the motion only once it is fully briefed. Defendant shall provide the Court with a courtesy copy of the filed, stamped, fully briefed motions, within two business days of filing. Memoranda of law and courtesy copies shall comply with this Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 12/28/2021. (Williams, Erica)
December 16, 2021 Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 Letter MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by All Plaintiffs. (Glasser, Jonathan)
December 15, 2021 Filing 9 Letter MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company. (Prasad, Anupama)
December 15, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Anupama Prasad on behalf of Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company (aty to be noticed) (Prasad, Anupama)
November 18, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company. (Brill, Melissa)
November 18, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa Brill on behalf of Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company (aty to be noticed) (Brill, Melissa)
November 18, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #7 Motion for Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company Extension of Time to Answer by 12/16/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 11/18/2021. (Vertus, Miriam)
November 3, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Arthur Portuguese on behalf of C.E. Towers LLC, CET LLC (aty to be noticed) (Portuguese, Eric)
November 2, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company. (Davis, Kimberly)
November 2, 2021 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
November 2, 2021 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
November 2, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT by C.E. Towers LLC and CET LLC against Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14990544 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by C.E. Towers LLC, CET LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Glasser, Jonathan)
November 2, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: C.E. Towers LLC et al v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C.E. Towers LLC
Represented By: Jonathan Glasser
Represented By: Eric Arthur Portuguese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CET LLC
Represented By: Jonathan Glasser
Represented By: Eric Arthur Portuguese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company
Represented By: Anupama Prasad
Represented By: Melissa Brill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?