Awadeh v. City of New York et al
Nemer Awadeh |
City of New York, Vincent Mandracchia and Jane John Doe No. 1-20 |
1:2021cv06312 |
November 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Sanket J Bulsara |
Ann M Donnelly |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic initial conference will be held at 10:30 A.M. on 2/11/2022 before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Rule 26(f) Report and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 2/11/2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the Rule 26(f) Report, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. Upon receipt of this email counsel shall confirm with each other of the date and time of this telephonic initial conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 12/13/2021. (Manson, Eddie) |
ORDER: The Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #8 , is hereby granted. Defendant City of New York shall file their answer on or before 2/7/2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 12/13/2021. (Manson, Eddie) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by City of New York. (Jacobs, Elissa) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to City of New York, Vincent Mandracchia. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by Nemer Awadeh (Roth, Adam) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Nemer Awadeh (Roth, Adam) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Nemer Awadeh (Roth, Adam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of New York, Jane John Doe No. 1-20, Vincent Mandracchia filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15028546 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Nemer Awadeh. (Attachments: #1 Video 1, #2 Video 2, #3 Certificate of Disposition) (Roth, Adam) |
Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.