Defuria v. Vane Line Bunkering, Inc. et al
| Paul Defuria |
| Vane Line Bunkering, Inc. and DBL-25 |
| 1:2021cv06356 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Eric R Komitee |
| Roanne L Mann |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 688 Jones Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Letter Addressed to Judge Eric R. Komitee Re: Status of Arbitration, etc by Paul Defuria (Hofmann, Paul) |
| Filing 15 Letter Addressed to Judge Komitee Re: Status of Arbitration, etc. by Vane Line Bunkering, Inc. (Bennett, William) |
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #13 Cross MOTION to Compel Arbitration, #11 MOTION to Compel Arbitration before the Society of Maritime Arbitrators filed by DBL-25, Vane Line Bunkering, Inc.. (Bennett, William) |
| Filing 13 Cross MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Paul Defuria. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit In Support, #2 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Maintenance & Wage Agreement, #3 Exhibit Ex. 2 - Defuria Complaint, #4 Exhibit Ex. 3 - Def equest to discontinue EDNY action, #5 Exhibit Ex. 4 - Email from plaintiff, #6 Exhibit Ex. 5 - Vane demand for arbitration, #7 Exhibit Ex. 6 - Defuria ltr re let's discuss the 3 potentials, #8 Exhibit Ex. 7 - Defuria Proposed Joint Consent Order, #9 Exhibit Ex. 7a - Email to def with proposed consent order, #10 Exhibit Ex. 8 - Def email acknowledging receipt of P designation of JAMS, #11 Exhibit Ex. 9 - Executed Proposed Joint Consent Order, #12 Exhibit Ex. 10 - Email agreeing to stip to arb, and again rec. JAMS, #13 Exhibit Ex. 11 - Letter objecting to SMA designation, #14 Exhibit Ex. 12 - Letter from Vane appointing 2nd Arbitrator, #15 Exhibit Ex. 13 - Letter from Vane saying SMA is the arb, saying P election of JAMS is void, #16 Exhibit Ex. 14 - JAMS_Comprehensive_Arbitration_Rules-2021, #17 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support) (Hofmann, Paul) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Dario Anthony Chinigo on behalf of Paul Defuria (aty to be noticed) (Chinigo, Dario) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Compel Arbitration before the Society of Maritime Arbitrators by Vane Line Bunkering, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support to Compel Arbitration, #2 Affirmation in Support, #3 Exhibit 1 - Wage Agreement, #4 Exhibit 2 - Notice Demanding Arbitration, #5 Exhibit 3 - Consent Order, #6 Exhibit 4 - Second Notice Arbitration, #7 Exhibit 5 - Letter, #8 Exhibit 6 - Defuria v. Vane Line, #9 Exhibit 7 - Letter, #10 Exhibit 8 - Defuria v. Vane Line) (Bennett, William) |
Filing 10
ORDER re #9 Proposed Pretrial Order -- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be stayed pending arbitration of this matter in accordance with the Advance Wage Agreement. Ordered by Judge Eric R. Komitee on 12/15/2021. (Guy, Alicia)
|
|
ORDER finding as moot #5 Motion for Pre Motion Conference -- See docket entry #10 . Ordered by Judge Eric R. Komitee on 12/15/2021. (Guy, Alicia)
|
| Filing 9 Proposed Pretrial Order / Joint Consent Order by Vane Line Bunkering, Inc. (Bennett, William) |
| Filing 8 REPLY in Opposition re #7 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Paul Defuria. (Hofmann, Paul) |
| Filing 7 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference re #1 Complaint, Re: Proposed Motion to Dismiss filed by Vane Line Bunkering, Inc.. (Bennett, William) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference re #1 Complaint, Re: Proposed Motion to Dismiss filed by Paul Defuria. (Hofmann, Paul) |
| NOTICE -- Defendant Vane Line Bunkering, Inc. submitted a letter requesting a pre-motion conference on an anticipated motion to dismiss on November 22, 2021. Plaintiff's counsel is reminded that pursuant to Rule III.B.3 of # Judge Komitee's Individual Motion Practices and Rules, Plaintiff is required to serve and file a letter response of three pages or less, within five days of service of Defendant's letter. (Guy, Alicia) |
| Filing 5 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference re #1 Complaint, Re: Proposed Motion to Dismiss by Vane Line Bunkering, Inc.. (Bennett, William) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Vane Line Bunkering, Inc.. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DBL-25, VANE LINE BUNKERING, INC. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15034308 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by PAUL DEFURIA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Hofmann, Paul) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Eric R. Komitee and Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
