Liggins v. Capra
| Jeffrey Liggins |
| Michael Capra |
| 1:2021cv06458 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Rachel P Kovner |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Order, petitioner's request for appointment of counsel, ECF No. #3 is denied without prejudice. See Attached Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 12/9/2021. (Rein, Gilbert)
|
|
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Within sixty days of the date of this Order, respondent shall file with the Court and serve on petitioner a return that shows why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. Respondent's return shall conform to the Court's Individual Rules governing habeas petitions. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 12/8/2021. (Daus, Benjamin)
|
|
ORDER: Petitioner's motion #2 to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. His motion #3 to appoint counsel is respectfully referred to Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 12/2/2021. (Daus, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 5
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Neptune, Pierre)
|
|
Filing 4
FILING FEE: $ 5.00, receipt number 4653161402. (Neptune, Pierre)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jeffrey Liggins. (Neptune, Pierre)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeffrey Liggins. (Neptune, Pierre)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28 U.S.C. 2254), filed by Jeffrey Liggins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt) (Neptune, Pierre)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Liggins v. Capra | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jeffrey Liggins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Michael Capra | |
| Represented By: | KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC |
| Represented By: | NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
