De Los Santos v. Cintron et al
Plaintiff: Hassiel Jimenez De Los Santos
Defendant: System Freight, Inc. and Benjamin Cintron
Case Number: 1:2021cv06468
Filed: November 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Sanket J Bulsara
Referring Judge: Allyne R Ross
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 23 U.S.C. ยง 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic initial conference will be held at 12:30 P.M. on 2/4/2022 before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Rule 26(f) Report and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 2/4/2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the Rule 26(f) Report, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. Upon receipt of this email counsel shall confirm with each other of the date and time of this telephonic initial conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 12/8/2021. (Manson, Eddie)
November 23, 2021 Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Hassiel Jimenez De Los Santos (Krigsfeld, Michael)
November 23, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Krigsfeld on behalf of Hassiel Jimenez De Los Santos (aty to be noticed) (Krigsfeld, Michael)
November 22, 2021 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Benjamin Cintron, System Freight, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Filing Removal in State Court, #2 Exhibit NYSCEF Confirmation, #3 Affidavit Service via First Class Mail) (Finkelstein, Matthew)
November 22, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Kory Finkelstein on behalf of All Defendants (notification declined or already on case) (Finkelstein, Matthew)
November 22, 2021 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Neptune, Pierre)
November 22, 2021 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Neptune, Pierre)
November 22, 2021 This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Neptune, Pierre)
November 19, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Neptune, Pierre)
November 19, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Supreme Court, Queens County, case number 709184/2021. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15049052) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Answers, #4 Exhibit C - Discovery Demands, #5 Exhibit D - PC Order, #6 Exhibit E - Response to PC Order, #7 Exhibit F - Discovery Demands, #8 Exhibit Rule 7.1 Statement) (Finkelstein, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: De Los Santos v. Cintron et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hassiel Jimenez De Los Santos
Represented By: Michael Krigsfeld
Represented By: Simon Benjamin Landsberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: System Freight, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Kory Finkelstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Benjamin Cintron
Represented By: Matthew Kory Finkelstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?