Cui v. Houghton et al
Zhigang Cui |
NY District Director Timothy Houghton, US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas and Nebraska Service Center |
1:2021cv06548 |
November 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Pamela K Chen |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Ekta R. Dharia on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Dharia, Ekta) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Zhigang Cui. Merrick Garland served on 12/1/2021, answer due 1/30/2022; Timothy Houghton served on 12/1/2021, answer due 1/30/2022; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 12/1/2021, answer due 1/30/2022; Nebraska Service Center served on 12/1/2021, answer due 1/30/2022. (Jia, Jason) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Nebraska Service Center, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Merrick Garland, Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Nebraska Service Center, filed by Zhigang Cui. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit Exhibits) (Jia, Jason) |
Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please submit Civil Cover Sheet. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Neptune, Pierre) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Hsien Chih Kung on behalf of Zhigang Cui (aty to be noticed) (Kung, Thomas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Merrick Garland, Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Nebraska Service Center filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15057244 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Zhigang Cui. (Jia, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.