Armijo v. Michigan Cooperative Corp.
| Marco Armijo |
| Michigan Cooperative Corp., Pamela Delorne, Joe Mohan, Delkap Management, Inc., Joe Russo and Anthony Lasaracina |
| 1:2021cv06550 |
| November 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by All Defendants. (Harfenist, Steven) |
| Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marco Armijo. Anthony Lasaracina served on 12/13/2021, answer due 1/15/2022. (Persanis, Matthew) |
| Filing 19 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Joe Mohan, Delkap Management, Inc., Pamela Delorne, Anthony Lasaracina, Michigan Cooperative Corp., Joe Russo. (Harfenist, Steven) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven J. Harfenist on behalf of Joe Mohan, Delkap Management, Inc., Pamela Delorne, Anthony Lasaracina, Michigan Cooperative Corp., Joe Russo (aty to be noticed) (Harfenist, Steven) |
ORDER granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to January 17, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 12/7/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marco Armijo. Joe Russo served on 12/1/2021, answer due 12/22/2021. (Persanis, Matthew) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marco Armijo. Delkap Management, Inc. served on 12/1/2021, answer due 12/22/2021. (Persanis, Matthew) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marco Armijo. (Persanis, Matthew) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marco Armijo. Joe Mohan served on 12/1/2021, answer due 12/22/2021. (Persanis, Matthew) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marco Armijo. Pamela Delorne served on 12/1/2021, answer due 12/22/2021. (Persanis, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marco Armijo. Michigan Cooperative Corp. served on 12/1/2021, answer due 12/22/2021. (Persanis, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Service for summons and complaint served on Joe Russo on Dec. 1 2021, filed by Marco Armijo. (Persanis, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service for summons and complaint served on Delkap Management on Dec. 1 2021, filed by Marco Armijo. (Persanis, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for summons and complaint served on Joe Mohan on Dec. 1 2021, filed by Marco Armijo. (Persanis, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for summons and complaint served on Pamela DeLorne on Dec. 1 2021, filed by Marco Armijo. (Persanis, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for summons and complaint served on Michigan Cooperative Corp on Dec. 1 2021, filed by Marco Armijo. (Persanis, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. by Marco Armijo (Persanis, Matthew) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER IN FLSA CASE REQUIRING DISCOVERY AND SETTING INITIAL PRETRIAL DISCOVERY AND MEDIATION SCHEDULE: The parties are ordered to engage in discovery as outlined in the attached Order, and to engage in early settlement discussions. A joint status report regarding settlement efforts must be filed by May 24, 2022. If the parties are unable to settle on their own, the case will be referred to EDNY Court-Annexed Mediation for formal mediation. The parties may move to waive these requirements and permit the parties to proceed by way of a Proposed Discovery Plan only for good cause, by filing a joint letter request on ECF. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 11/24/2021. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Marco Armijo as to All Defendants. (Persanis, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15057367 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Marco Armijo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Persanis, Matthew) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: If multiple defendants, there must me a rider attached to the summons with the name and addresses of all defendants included., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
