Wang et al v. Garland et al
| Hong Wang, Xiaoli Chen, Zhihe Wang and Yanming Ma |
| US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Director Kirt Thompson, Secretary Antony J. Blinken and John and Jane Does #1-5 |
| 1:2021cv06923 |
| December 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Diane Gujarati |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER DISMISSING PARTIES -- Per the Stipulation of Dismissal #11 filed on January 28, 2022, Plaintiff Hong Wang's claims are hereby dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 1/31/2022. (Almonte, Kelly)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal Partial, As to Claims of Plaintiff Hong Wang, Without Prejudice Against Refiling, by Antony J. Blinken, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, John and Jane Does #1-5, Alejandro Mayorkas, Kirt Thompson (Dickman, Mary) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hong Wang, Yanming Ma. Antony J. Blinken served on 1/3/2022, answer due 3/4/2022; Merrick B. Garland served on 1/3/2022, answer due 3/4/2022; Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 1/3/2022, answer due 3/4/2022; John and Jane Does #1-5 served on 1/3/2022, answer due 3/4/2022; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 1/3/2022, answer due 3/4/2022; Kirt Thompson served on 1/3/2022, answer due 3/4/2022. (Yan, David) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED Summons Issued as to Antony J. Blinken, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, John and Jane Does #1-5, Alejandro Mayorkas, Kirt Thompson, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Layne, Monique) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Summons. Re #5 Order to Show Cause (Federal),,,,, #6 Amended Complaint by Yanming Ma, Hong Wang (Yan, David) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary M. Dickman on behalf of Antony J. Blinken, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Kirt Thompson (aty to be noticed) (Dickman, Mary) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 USC 1361 against Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Kirt Thompson, Antony J. Blinken, John and Jane Does #1-5, filed by Hong Wang, Yanming Ma. (Yan, David) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The United States Attorney, as attorney for Defendants, is directed to show cause on or before February 18, 2022 , in writing, why a #1 Writ of Mandamus should not be issued, and shall serve a copy of the response on Plaintiffs, with proof of such service to the Clerk of this Court. On or before March 21, 2022, Plaintiffs shall file a reply, if any, with proof of service to the Clerk of this Court. Oral argument shall be heard on April 20, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. via teleconference before Judge Diane Gujarati. The call-in information for the telephone conference is 1-877-336-1839 and the access code is 2643682. The Parties should call in to the telephone conference five minutes before the conference begins. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of any court proceeding or communication with the Court are prohibited. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions. A transcript of the proceedings may be ordered from the Clerk's Office. If any party has difficulty accessing the telephone conference, please contact chambers at Gujarati_Chambers@nyed.uscourts.gov. SO ORDERED by Judge Diane Gujarati on 12/20/2021. *** Electronic Service upon the U.S. Attorney's Office re: this Order to Show Cause and Plaintiffs' #1 Complaint / Writ of Mandamus.*** (Almonte, Kelly)
|
| Filing 4 Letter requesting the Court to issue an Order to Show Cause to the United States Attorney, the attorney for Defendants, why a writ of mandamus should not be issued by Xiaoli Chen, Hong Wang, Zhihe Wang (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order to Show Cause) (Yan, David) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT of Writ of Mandamus against Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Kirt Thompson filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15120666 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Hong Wang, Zhihe Wang, Xiaoli Chen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet for a Writ of Mandamus) (Yan, David) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Diane Gujarati. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) Modified on 12/16/2021 (Bowens, Priscilla). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
