Sajib v. Renaud et al
Plaintiff: Yeakub Sajib
Respondent: Acting Director Tracy Renaud, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Texas Service Center, US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, John Does 1-10 and Jane Does 1-10
Case Number: 1:2021cv07039
Filed: December 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brian M Cogan
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Yeakub Sajib. (Gharti-Chhetry, Khagendra)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #8 . Plaintiff's opposition due 3/3/2022; reply due 3/10/2022. This is very likely the final extension that plaintiff will receive on this motion. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 2/8/2022. (Weisberg, Peggy)
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda Civic on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Texas Service Center (aty to be noticed) (Civic, Amanda)
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER deferring ruling on #6 . The premotion conference is waived and the Initial Status Conference scheduled for 2/2/2022 is adjourned without date. This motion is deemed to constitute defendants' motion to dismiss on the grounds stated. Plaintiff's opposition due 2/10/2022; reply due 2/17/2022. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 1/27/2022. (Weisberg, Peggy)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 First MOTION for pre motion conference prior to moving to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), by Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Texas Service Center. (Price, Thomas)
December 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Russell Price on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Texas Service Center (aty to be noticed) (Price, Thomas)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Texas Service Center, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition for writ of Mandamus against Merrick B. Garland, Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Texas Service Center filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15135877 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Yeakub Sajib. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Gharti-Chhetry, Khagendra)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear before the Honorable Brian M. Cogan for a telephonic Initial Status Conference on 2/2/2022 at 5:30 pm. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852 followed by access code 6427877#. When the conference begins parties will be prompted to input the security code 7039#. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to notify all attorneys in this action of the conference schedule in writing. No later than 24 hours prior to the Initial Status Conference, the Government must file a brief letter advising the Court whether the status of the case has changed since the filing of the complaint. Counsel is directed to review Judge Cogan's Individual Practices, which may be obtained on the Court's website at https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/content/judge-brian-m-cogan. Requests for adjournment of the conference will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Judge Cogan's Rules. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 12/21/2021. (Weisberg, Peggy)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sajib v. Renaud et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yeakub Sajib
Represented By: Khagendra Gharti-Chhetry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Acting Director Tracy Renaud
Represented By: Thomas Russell Price
Represented By: Amanda Civic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Alejandro N. Mayorkas
Represented By: Thomas Russell Price
Represented By: Amanda Civic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Texas Service Center
Represented By: Thomas Russell Price
Represented By: Amanda Civic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland
Represented By: Thomas Russell Price
Represented By: Amanda Civic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jane Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?