Meisner v. Commissioner of Social Security
Edward Meisner |
Commissioner of Social Security |
1:2022cv00100 |
January 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Pamela K Chen |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed on behalf of pro se Edward Meisner. Commissioner of Social Security served on 2/15/2022. See Remarks on USM-285 Form: "USM - 299 Mail / Certified Mail / See Attached." (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
Filing 11 Motion(Memorandum) In Opposition To Defendant's #8 MOTION to Change Venue filed by Pltff. Edward Meisner. (Layne, Monique) (Main Document 11 replaced on 2/16/2022) (Layne, Monique). (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/23/2022: #1 Signed Memo. In Opp. (recv'd. on 2/23/22)) (Layne, Monique). |
ORDER: By 2/25/2022, Plaintiff is directed to file a response to the Commissioner's #8 Motion to Change Venue. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 2/11/2022. (Sharon, William) |
Filing 10 DECLARATION re #8 MOTION to Change Venue Declaration of Service Via Regular Mail by Commissioner of Social Security (Fitzhugh, Nicol) |
Filing 9 DECLARATION re #7 Notice of Appearance Declaration of Service via Regular Mail by Commissioner of Social Security (Fitzhugh, Nicol) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Change Venue by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support) (Fitzhugh, Nicol) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicol Fitzhugh on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (aty to be noticed) (Fitzhugh, Nicol) |
ORDER: By 2/18/2022, Defendant is directed to respond to Plaintiff's #6 Motion, and to address whether the Court has jurisdiction to hear Plaintiff's request to issue "injunctive relief compelling SSA to rule on Plaintiff's "request for reconsideration and to expedite any further appeals such that he can exhaust his remedies." (See Complaint, Dkt. 1, at 5.) In light of Plaintiff's #6 Motion and the nature of the requested relief in the #1 Complaint, the Court also vacates its #4 Scheduling Order. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 2/4/2022. (Sharon, William) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Expedite (Request for Expedited Consideration of Motion to Compel) by Edward Meisner. (Layne, Monique) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/4/2022: #1 Memo. In Support) (Layne, Monique). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Courtesy copies of the Summons, the Court's 1/12/2022 Order and Plaintiff's #1 Complaint sent to the United States Attorney General; United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York; and General Counsel at SSA.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Plaintiff, pro se, is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Defendant must file the administrative record, which will constitute Defendant's answer, or otherwise move against the complaint by 4/12/2022. Defendant must file and serve a motion for judgment on the pleadings, which must contain a full recitation of the relevant facts and administrative record, by 6/13/2022. Plaintiff must file and serve a response to Defendant's motion, and any cross-motion, by 8/12/2022. Defendant must file and serve its reply, if any, by 9/2/2022. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 1/12/2022. VACATED pursuant to Order of Judge Pamela K. Chen dated 2/4/2022. This entry has been modified on 2/4/2022 to indicate the Order is vacated. (Gonzalez, Fida). |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Neptune, Pierre) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edward Meisner. (Neptune, Pierre) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Edward Meisner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Neptune, Pierre) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Meisner v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Edward Meisner | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC |
Represented By: | Nicol Fitzhugh |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.