Espinoza v. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
| Bryan Espinoza |
| The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation |
| 1:2022cv00184 |
| January 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
Letter dated 3/28/22 from Bryan Espinoza, to Judge Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Bloom regarding Motion to Compel/Sanction Non-Complying Party. (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
|
Filing 18
Letter to Judge Donnelly and Judge Bloom from Bryan Espinoza, Pro Se regarding the filing of a motion to compel and a motion for hearing before Judge Donnelly. (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
|
Filing 17
Plaintiff's Response re: seeking Settlement amount filed by Bryan Espinoza, plaintiff pro se. (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
|
Filing 16
Plaintiff's Affirmation of Exhibits in support of request seeking settlement filed by Bryan Espinoza, plaintiff pro se. (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
|
Filing 15
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation re Scheduling Order, (Diakos, Joanna)
|
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court has received the plaintiff's #11 motion to remand and the defendant's #13 response in opposition. The plaintiff's reply, if any, is due on or before March 10, 2022. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 2/24/2022. (Baer, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 14
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation re #13 Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff Bryan Espinoza's Motion to Remand (Diakos, Joanna)
|
|
Filing 13
MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #12 MOTION to Remand to State Court /to Remand Latest Notice of Removal Back to State Court filed by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (Diakos, Joanna)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to Remand to State Court /to Remand Latest Notice of Removal Back to State Court by Bryan Espinoza. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Object and Appeal Notice of Removal, #2 Memo of Law, #3 Affidavit/Affirmation) (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bryan Espinoza. (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: In light of the schedule set for defendant's motion to dismiss, ECF No. #8 , the initial conference scheduled for February 17, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. is cancelled. See attached Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 1/21/2022. (Yindra, Hannah)
|
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court has received #8 the defendant's motion to dismiss. The plaintiff must file its response by February 22, 2022, and the defendant's reply, if any, is due by March 8, 2022. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 1/21/2022. (Baer, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , Notice to Pro Se Litigant who Opposes a Rule 12 Motion Supported by Matters Outside the Pleadings (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Diakos, Joanna)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration of Joanna A. Diakos, #3 Exhibit 1 - Initial Complaint, #4 Exhibit 2 - Scheduling Order, #5 Exhibit 3 - Notice of Appeal, #6 Exhibit 4 - Dismissal Order, #7 Exhibit 5 - Notice of Appeal, #8 Exhibit 6- Amended Notice of Appeal, #9 Exhibit 7 - FBI Complaint, #10 Exhibit 8 - Docket, #11 Exhibit 9 - Endorsed Complaint, #12 Exhibit 10 - Affidavit of Service, #13 Declaration of John B. Greer, #14 Certificate of Service) (Diakos, Joanna)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Defendant The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation removed pro se plaintiff's personal injury case from Kings County Supreme Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332 on January 12, 2022. ECF No. #1 . Defendant shall respond to plaintiff's Complaint by January 19, 2022. F.R.C.P. 81(c)(2)(C). Any party seeking a trial by jury shall file a jury demand by January 28, 2022. Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c)(3)(A).The Court shall hold the initial conference by telephone on February 17, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall call the Chambers telephone conference line at (888) 363-4734 and use the access code 4444221 promptly at 10:00 a.m. No planning conference pursuant to Rule 26(a) shall be required at this time. Parties are advised that they must contact each other before making any request for an adjournment to the Court. Any request for an adjournment must be electronically filed with the Court at least seventy-two (72) hours before the scheduled conference. See attached Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 1/14/2022. (Yindra, Hannah)
|
|
Filing 6
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
|
|
Filing 5
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Anthony Warns on behalf of The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (aty to be noticed) (Warns, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Joanna A Diakos on behalf of The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (notification declined or already on case) (Diakos, Joanna)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Diakos, Joanna)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation from Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, case number CV-026562-21/KI. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15189175) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Diakos, Joanna)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Espinoza v. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bryan Espinoza | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation | |
| Represented By: | Joanna A Diakos |
| Represented By: | Thomas Anthony Warns |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
