Umpherson v. Mayorkas et al
| John James Umpherson |
| The Honorable Alejandro Mayorkas, US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Director USCIS NSC Loren K. Miller |
| 1:2022cv00307 |
| January 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by John James Umpherson (DeBellis Aviv, Lauren) |
Civil Case Terminated as per plaintiff's Rule 41(a) notice. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 3/14/2022. (Cogan, Brian)
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John James Umpherson. All Defendants. (DeBellis Aviv, Lauren) |
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Status Letter, Consent MOTION to Adjourn Conference by Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren K. Miller. (Civic, Amanda) |
|
ORDER granting in part #9 . Initial Status Conference adjourned to 4/8/2022 at 2:30 PM. No later than 24 hours prior to the Initial Status Conference, the Government is reminded to file a brief letter advising the Court whether the status of the case has changed since the filing of the complaint. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 2/27/2022. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda Civic on behalf of Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren K. Miller (aty to be noticed) (Civic, Amanda) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren K. Miller, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Guzzi, Roseann) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. by John James Umpherson (DeBellis Aviv, Lauren) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint,, by John James Umpherson (DeBellis Aviv, Lauren) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The name on the summons does not match the name as it appears on the complaint., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Guzzi, Roseann) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by John James Umpherson (DeBellis Aviv, Lauren) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For DECLARATORY AND EQUITABLE RELIEF against Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren K. Miller filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15207437 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by John James Umpherson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Table of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Proposed Summons Civil Process Clerk, #10 Proposed Summons Mayorkas, #11 Proposed Summons Garland, #12 Proposed Summons Jaddou, #13 Proposed Summons Miller) (DeBellis Aviv, Lauren) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear before the Honorable Brian M. Cogan for a telephonic Initial Status Conference on 3/3/2022 at 11:00 am. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852 followed by access code 6427877#. When the conference begins parties will be prompted to input the security code 0307#. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to notify all attorneys in this action of the conference schedule in writing. No later than 24 hours prior to the Initial Status Conference, the Government must file a brief letter advising the Court whether the status of the case has changed since the filing of the complaint. Counsel is directed to review Judge Cogan's Individual Practices, which may be obtained on the Court's website at https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/content/judge-brian-m-cogan. Requests for adjournment of the conference will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Judge Cogan's Rules. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 1/19/2022. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: If multiple defendants, there must me a rider attached to the summons with the name and addresses of all defendants included., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
