Rhodes v. Luis et al
Plaintiff: Lailona M Rhodes
Defendant: Howard L Luis and Cheche Dispatch Solutions, LLC
Case Number: 1:2022cv00429
Filed: January 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Frederic Block
Referring Judge: Robert M Levy
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2022 Filing 8 RESPONSE to Discovery Request by Lailona M Rhodes. (Bogoraz, Karine)
March 21, 2022 Filing 7 RESPONSE to Discovery Request by Cheche Dispatch Solutions, LLC, Howard L Luis. (Attachments: #1 Rule 26(a) Disclosure Exhibit A, #2 Rule 26(a) Disclosure Exhibit B) (Epstein, Joshua)
March 1, 2022 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy: Karine Bogoraz, Joshua Epstein. Initial disclosures by 3/22/22. Fact discovery deadline 9/1/22. Expert discovery: plaintiff's disclosures 10/3/22; defendants' disclosures 11/4/22. Next conference 9/13/22 at 10:00 (same dial-in number and access code)(close of fact discovery.)Initial Conference Hearing held on 3/1/2022 (Levy, Robert)
January 28, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua Epstein on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Epstein, Joshua)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference by telephone has been scheduled for March 1, 2022 at 1:30 p.m., before the Honorable Robert M. Levy, United States Magistrate Judge at (888) 684-8852; Access Code #: 6223489. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 1/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 IC QUESTIONNAIRE, #2 INDIVIDUAL RULES) (Marino, Janine)
January 26, 2022 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
January 26, 2022 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
January 26, 2022 This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Bowens, Priscilla)
January 25, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
January 25, 2022 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Notice of Removal, by Cheche Dispatch Solutions, LLC, Howard L Luis (Kluepfel, David)
January 25, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Supreme Kings, case number 523879/2021. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BNYEDC-15226530) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Affidavit of Service) (Kluepfel, David)
January 25, 2022 Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet (MISSING SECOND PAGE FORM). All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rhodes v. Luis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lailona M Rhodes
Represented By: Karine Bogoraz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howard L Luis
Represented By: David F. Kluepfel
Represented By: Joshua Epstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cheche Dispatch Solutions, LLC
Represented By: David F. Kluepfel
Represented By: Joshua Epstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?