Campos v. Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York et al
| Rammses Morales Campos |
| Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York, AdvantageCare Physicians, P.C., Mid Rockland Imaging Partners, Inc., RadNet, P.C. and 4771 Hylan Boulevard LLC |
| 1:2022cv00532 |
| January 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Carol Bagley Amon |
| Taryn A Merkl |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' stipulation #7 filed 3/16/2022, extending Defendants Mid Rockland Imaging Partners, Inc. and RadNet, P.C.'s time to answer. These Defendants are respectfully directed to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint by 4/8/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl on 3/17/2022. (Cahn, Gabriel)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer by Mid Rockland Imaging Partners, Inc., RadNet, P.C. (Harris, Warren) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE by Rammses Morales Campos (Trerotola, Deborah) |
|
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' stipulation #5 filed 2/15/2022, extending Defendants Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York, AdvantageCare Physicians, P.C., and 771 Hylan Boulevard LLC's time to answer. These Defendants are respectfully directed to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint by 4/14/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl on 2/16/2022. (Cahn, Gabriel)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER by Rammses Morales Campos (Trerotola, Deborah) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to 4771 Hylan Boulevard LLC, AdvantageCare Physicians, P.C., Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York, Mid Rockland Imaging Partners, Inc., RadNet, P.C.. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Carol Bagley Amon and Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15240703 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Rammses Morales Campos. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Trerotola, Deborah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
