Josephs v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Cheery Josephs |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., TransUnion, LLC and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC |
| 1:2022cv00603 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement with Experian Information Solutions by Cheery Josephs (Geller, Edward) |
ORDER: In light of the notice of settlement filed at #12 , the parties are directed to file a stipulation of dismissal by May 23, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 3/23/2022. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint and Defenses by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (O'Connor, Colleen) |
|
Order Dismissing Parties. Party TransUnion, LLC terminated. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 2/15/2022. (Greene, Donna)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cheery Josephs of Transunion (Geller, Edward) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cheery Josephs of Trans Union (Geller, Edward) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cheery Josephs Of Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (Geller, Edward) |
|
Order Dismissing Party. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC terminated.Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 2/9/2022. (Greene, Donna)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE Designating Case To Arbitration. This case has been designated to participate in the non-binding Court Annexed Arbitration Program pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.7. The Rule requires the Clerk of Court to designate and process for compulsory arbitration "all civil cases (excluding social security cases, tax matters, prisoners' civil rights cases, and any action based on an alleged violation of a right secured by the Constitution of the United States or if jurisdiction is based in whole or in part on Title 28 U.S.C. sec. 1343) wherein money damages only are being sought in an amount not in excess of $150,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs." Damages are presumed not to be in excess of the arbitration limit unless a certification is filed in accordance with Local Civil Rule 83.7. An Arbitration Hearing will be scheduled after an Answer is filed. (Credle, Rita) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (O'Connor, Colleen) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward B. Geller on behalf of Cheery Josephs (notification declined or already on case) (Geller, Edward) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (Credle, Rita) |
|
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to March 11, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 2/3/2022. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate VantageScore Solutions LLC for Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (O'Connor, Colleen) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. from Kings County Civil Court, case number 028974. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15251886) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (O'Connor, Colleen) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
