Perez v. Church Ave. Car Service Inc. et al
| Andrea V Perez |
| Church Ave. Car Service Inc. doing business as Church Avenue Car Service, Carlos Betancourt and Paolo Betancourt |
| 1:2022cv00964 |
| February 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Minute Entry and Order for Initial Status Conference before Judge Brian M. Cogan on 4/8/2022. Counsel for plaintiff present by telephone. Conference reset for 5/3/2022 at 3:00 pm. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852 followed by access code 6427877#. When the conference begins parties will be prompted to input the security code 0964#. Parties are also reminded to comply with the mandatory requirements for the conference at #6 . (Weisberg, Peggy) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andrea V Perez. Church Ave. Car Service Inc. served on 4/6/2022, answer due 4/27/2022. (Sojo, Catalina) |
| Set/Reset Hearing: Initial Status Conference set for 10:00 am on 4/8/2022 is reset to 5:00 pm. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852 followed by access code 6427877#. When the conference begins parties will be prompted to input the security code 0964#. (Weisberg, Peggy) |
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic Initial Status Conference is set for 4/8/2022 at 10:00 am. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852 followed by access code 6427877#. When the conference begins parties will be prompted to input the security code 0964#. See attached mandatory requirements for the conference. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 2/22/2022. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Neptune, Pierre) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Neptune, Pierre) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Neptune, Pierre) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Andrea V Perez (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Summons with Rider) (Sojo, Catalina) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carlos Betancourt, Paolo Betancourt, Church Ave. Car Service Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15312226 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Andrea V Perez. (Sojo, Catalina) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Neptune, Pierre) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
