Najera et al v. SR Mango House Inc. et al
| Andres Najera, Mario Avila and Elpidio Munguia |
| SR Mango House Inc. and Shoaibur Rahman |
| 1:2022cv01051 |
| February 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Rachel P Kovner |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER: Defendant Rahman, proceeding pro se, requests a second extension of time to respond to plaintiffs' Complaint. ECF No. #14 . The request is granted. The Court has informed defendant that while he can represent himself in this action, corporations must be represented by a licensed attorney. See Grace v. Bank Leumi Trust Co. of NY, 443 F.3d 180, 187 (2d Cir. 2006) ("it is well-settled law that a corporation may appear in the federal courts only through licensed counsel"). The Court granted defendant SR Mango House Inc. an extension of time to respond to the Complaint by an attorney until April 24, 2022. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint by June 3, 2022, and defendant SR Mango House Inc. shall respond by an attorney. As the Court has already informed defendant that SR Mango House Inc. must appear by counsel, if SR Mango House Inc. fails to respond to plaintiffs' Complaint by an attorney by June 3, 2022, plaintiffs may move for a default against defendant. See attached Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 4/27/2022. (Yindra, Hannah)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Shoaibur Rahman, SR Mango House Inc.. (Lee, Tiffeny) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andres Najera, Elpidio Munguia, Mario Avila. SR Mango House Inc. served on 3/11/2022, answer due 4/1/2022. (Avshalumov, Roman) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: Defendant Shoaibur Rahman, proceeding pro se, requests an extension of time to respond to the Complaint. ECF No. #10 . As it is a first request, the request is granted. Mr. Rahman shall respond to plaintiffs' Complaint by April 24, 2022. Defendant is advised that while he can represent himself in this action, corporations cannot represent themselves in federal court and must be represented by a licensed attorney. See Grace v. Bank Leumi Trust Co. of NY, 443 F.3d 180, 187 (2d Cir. 2006) ("it is well-settled law that a corporation may appear in the federal courts only through licensed counsel"). The Court sua sponte extends the time for defendant SR Mango House Inc. to respond to the Complaint until April 24, 2022. SR Mango House Inc. shall respond to plaintiffs' Complaint by an attorney. Defendant may contact the Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Project, a free, limited-scope legal assistance clinic operated by the City Bar Justice Center of the New York City Bar Association. See attached Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 3/17/2022. (Yindra, Hannah) (Main Document 12 replaced on 3/18/2022) (Yindra, Hannah).
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Answer filed by Shoaibur Rahman. (Herrera, Isaiah) |
| Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Shoaibur Rahman. (Herrera, Isaiah) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andres Najera, Elpidio Munguia, Mario Avila. Shoaibur Rahman served on 3/4/2022, answer due 3/25/2022; SR Mango House Inc. served on 3/4/2022, answer due 3/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Mndala Dipankar, CO-TENANT) (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andres Najera, Elpidio Munguia, Mario Avila. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit SAVITA SINGH, CO-WORKER) (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 7 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by James Patrick Peter O'Donnell on behalf of Mario Avila, Elpidio Munguia, Andres Najera (aty to be noticed) (O'Donnell, James) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #2 Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet, #1 Complaint, by Mario Avila, Elpidio Munguia, Andres Najera (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Mario Avila, Elpidio Munguia, Andres Najera (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shoaibur Rahman, SR Mango House Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15326806 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Andres Najera, Elpidio Munguia, Mario Avila. (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner and Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
