Abraham v. The City of New York et al
Plaintiff: Victor Abraham
Defendant: The City of New York, Steven Lutz, Steven Zielinski and Jennifer Hamilton
Case Number: 1:2022cv01162
Filed: March 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Robert M Levy
Referring Judge: Kiyo A Matsumoto
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #10 Motion for sixty-day enlargement of time, from April 12, 2022 until June 13, 2022 for defendant City to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint; granting sua sponte sixty-day enlargement of time, from April 14, 2022, to June 13, 2022, for Detective Lutz, Sgt. Zielinski, and Officer Hamilton to answer or otherwise respond. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 4/13/2022. (Marino, Janine)
April 12, 2022 Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by The City of New York. (McGuire, Caroline)
April 4, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Victor Abraham. Jennifer Hamilton served on 3/24/2022, answer due 4/14/2022. (Fu, Yan)
April 4, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Victor Abraham. Steven Lutz served on 3/24/2022, answer due 4/14/2022. (Fu, Yan)
April 4, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Victor Abraham. Steven Zielinski served on 3/24/2022, answer due 4/14/2022. (Fu, Yan)
March 24, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Victor Abraham. The City of New York served on 3/22/2022, answer due 4/12/2022. (Fu, Yan)
March 21, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Jennifer Hamilton, Steven Lutz, The City of New York, Steven Zielinski. (Tavarez, Jennifer)
March 8, 2022 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by Victor Abraham (Attachments: #1 Rider to Summons) (Fu, Yan)
March 3, 2022 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
March 3, 2022 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
March 3, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jennifer Hamilton, Steven Lutz, The City of New York, Steven Zielinski filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15342147 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Victor Abraham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons with Rider) (Fu, Yan) (Main Document 1 replaced on 3/3/2022) (Bowens, Priscilla). (Attachment 2 replaced on 3/3/2022) (Bowens, Priscilla).
March 3, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)
March 3, 2022 Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The CLERK OF COURT Name needs to be corrected/updated, Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Davis, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abraham v. The City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Victor Abraham
Represented By: Yan Fu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of New York
Represented By: Caroline McGuire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Lutz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Zielinski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jennifer Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?