Jiang v. Mayorkas et al
| Xin Qin Jiang |
| Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Kirt Thompson, Christopher A. Wray and Merrick B. Garland |
| 1:2022cv01190 |
| March 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated. (Valentin, Winnethka) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Kirt Thompson, Christopher A. Wray (Price, Thomas) |
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. The United States Attorney, as attorney for defendants, is directed to show cause on or before 5/10/2022, in writing, why a writ of mandamus should not be issued, and shall serve a copy of the response on plaintiff, with proof of such service to the Clerk of this Court. On or before 6/7/2022, plaintiff shall file her reply, if any, with proof of service to the Clerk of this Court. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 4/5/2022. (Bacchi, Joseph)
|
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 Order to Show Cause (Federal),, by Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Kirt Thompson, Christopher A. Wray. (Price, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Russell Price on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Price, Thomas) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and Electronic Service upon the US Attorneys Office re #1 Complaint, filed by Xin Qin Jiang. The United States Attorney, as attorney for defendants, is directed to show cause on or before 4/11/2022, in writing, why a writ of mandamus should not be issued, and shall serve a copy of the response on plaintiff, with proof of such service to the Clerk of this Court. On or before 5/9/2022, plaintiff shall file her reply, if any, with proof of service to theClerk of this Court; Show Cause Hearing set for 6/30/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6F North before Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie. So Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/11/2022. (service made electroncially) (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xin Qin Jiang. Merrick B. Garland served on 3/9/2022, answer due 3/30/2022; Ur M. Jaddou served on 3/9/2022, answer due 3/30/2022; Alejandro N. Mayorkas served on 3/9/2022, answer due 3/30/2022; Kirt Thompson served on 3/9/2022, answer due 3/30/2022; Christopher A. Wray served on 3/9/2022, answer due 3/30/2022. (Rahman, Meer Md.) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and Electronic Service upon the US Attorneys Office re #1 Complaint, filed by Xin Qin Jiang. The United States Attorney, as attorney for defendants, is directed to show cause on or before 4/1/22, in writing, why a writ of mandamus should not be issued, and shall serve a copy of the response on plaintiff, with proof of such service to the Clerk of this Court. On or before 5/6/22, plaintiff shall file her reply, if any, with proof of such service to the Clerk of this Court. Oral argument shall be heard on 6/10/2022 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6F North before Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie. So Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/4/2022. All copies mailed electronically via CM/ECF (Piper, Francine)
|
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #1 Complaint, by Xin Qin Jiang (Rahman, Meer Md.) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Xin Qin Jiang (Rahman, Meer Md.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Kirt Thompson, Christopher A. Wray filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15345892 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Xin Qin Jiang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rahman, Meer Md.) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
