Dyer v. Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare
| Nadine Dyer |
| Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare |
| 1:2022cv01212 |
| March 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Roanne L Mann |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
STIPULATION OFDISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff, NADINE DYER, and Defendant HOPKINS CENTER FOR REHABILITATION ANDHEALTHCARE, through their respective undersigned counsel, that pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1)(A)(ii) the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety, withprejudice, and with no award of attorneys fees, costs or disbursements by the Court to any party.Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 8/11/2022. (Williams-Jackson, Sandra)
|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare (Schlossberg, Jeffrey) |
|
ORDER re #14 Letter. The Court commends the parties for their efforts to resolve this case. In light of settlement, the parties are directed to file a stipulation of dismissal by August 11, 2022. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 7/3/2022. (Williams-Jackson, Sandra)
|
| Filing 14 Letter Regarding Post-Mediation Status Report by Nadine Dyer (Filippatos, Parisis) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 05/19/22, before Judge MATSUMOTO. Court Reporter/Transcriber RIVKA TEICH, Telephone number 718-613-2268. Email address: RIVKATEICH@GMAIL.COM. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER.File redaction request using event "Redaction Request - Transcript" located under "Other Filings - Other Documents". Redaction Request due 7/13/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/23/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/20/2022. (Teich, Rivka) |
|
ORDER. The Court is in receipt of #12 . The parties shall submit a post-mediation status report by June 30, 2022. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 5/23/2022. (Ahn, Lois)
|
| Filing 12 Letter Regarding Agreed Upon Mediation by Nadine Dyer (Filippatos, Parisis) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto: Pre Motion Conference held on 5/19/2022. Appearances: Parisis Filippatos, Esq. for Plaintiff; Jeffrey Schlossberg, Esq. for Defendant. The Court held a pre-motion conference in Courtroom 6C South to discuss Defendant's proposed motion to dismiss. As discussed on the record, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to amend the complaint. The parties having expressed interest in engaging in further settlement discussions prior to engaging in motion practice, the parties shall, by May 23, 2022 file a joint letter advising the Court whether they would submit to a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Mann, court-annexed mediation, or private mediation. By May 26, 2022, Plaintiff shall convey to Defendant a reasonable, good-faith settlement demand, and file the amended complaint on the docket. By June 6, 2022, Defendant shall convey to Plaintiff a settlement offer. (Court Reporter Rivka Teich.) (Ahn, Lois) |
| Filing 11 Letter in Response to Defendant's Request for Pre-Motion Conference; filed by Nadine Dyer (Filippatos, Parisis) Modified. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
|
ORDER granting #10 . Pre Motion Hearing set for 5/19/2022 03:00 PM in Courtroom 6C South before Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto. The parties shall appear by telephone. Plaintiffs shall file a response, if any, to Defendant's #10 letter requesting a pre-motion conference by May 13, 2022. The parties shall dial into the conference by calling 1-888-684-8852 and entering the following access code: 1312089. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 5/9/2022. (Ahn, Lois)
|
| Filing 10 Letter Requesting Pre-Motion Conference for Motion to Dismiss by Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 1-13-21 letter to Cathy Friedman) (Schlossberg, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Bodansky on behalf of Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare (aty to be noticed) (Bodansky, Brian) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey M. Schlossberg on behalf of Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare (aty to be noticed) (Schlossberg, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Nadine Dyer. Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare waiver sent on 3/7/2022, answer due 5/6/2022. (Filippatos, Parisis) |
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Nadine Dyer (Filippatos, Parisis) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Nadine Dyer (Filippatos, Parisis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15348459 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Nadine Dyer. (Filippatos, Parisis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dyer v. Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nadine Dyer | |
| Represented By: | Parisis G. Filippatos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | |
| Represented By: | Brian Bodansky |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey M. Schlossberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
