Zhang v. Garland et al
Plaintiff: Junqiao Zhang
Defendant: US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas and Patricia A. Menges
Case Number: 1:2022cv01281
Filed: March 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Margo K Brodie
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. The Court grants Defendants' request to extend the deadline to respond to the Order to Show Cause. Defendants will respond to the Order to Show cause on or before June 10, 2022, and Plaintiff will file her reply, if any, on or before July 8, 2022. The oral argument scheduled for June 30, 2022, is adjourned. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 4/13/2022.(Collins, Natalie)
April 12, 2022 Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 Order to Show Cause (Federal),, by Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Patricia A. Menges. (Stamatelos, Paulina)
April 1, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Paulina Stamatelos on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Stamatelos, Paulina)
March 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and Electronic Service upon the US Attorneys Office re #1 Complaint, filed by Junqiao Zhang. The United States Attorney, as attorney for defendants, is directed to show cause on or before 4/11/2022, in writing, why a writ of mandamus should not be issued. On or before 5/9/2022, plaintiff shall file her reply, if any, with proof of service to the Clerk of this Court. Show Cause Hearing set for 6/30/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6F North before Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie. Show Cause So Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/11/2022. (copies mailed electronically) (Lee, Tiffeny)
March 14, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Junqiao Zhang. Merrick B. Garland served on 3/14/2022, answer due 5/13/2022; Alejandro N. Mayorkas served on 3/14/2022, answer due 5/13/2022; Patricia A. Menges served on 3/14/2022, answer due 5/13/2022. (Gu, Wei)
March 9, 2022 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 9, 2022 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 9, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Patricia A. Menges filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15359519 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Junqiao Zhang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons) (Gu, Wei)
March 9, 2022 Case Assigned to Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zhang v. Garland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Junqiao Zhang
Represented By: Wei Gu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland
Represented By: Paulina Stamatelos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro N. Mayorkas
Represented By: Paulina Stamatelos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia A. Menges
Represented By: Paulina Stamatelos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?