Robinson et al v. Lee
| Norma Robinson and Audley Stewart |
| Daunette & Damien Lee |
| 1:2022cv01284 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Robert M Levy |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Norma Robinson, Audley Stewart. Daunette & Damien Lee served on 4/1/2022, answer due 4/21/2022. (Layne, Monique) |
| REQUEST for Certificate of Default is denied at this time as to Defendants. The Summons Returned Executed filed at DE#6, does not indicate that the Summons AND Complaint was served. It only indicates that the "Summons in a Civil Action" was served. re #7 Request for Certificate of Default (Poveda, J.) |
| Filing 7 Request for Certificate of Default by Norma Robinson and Audley Stewart. (Almonte, Giselle) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Norma Robinson, Audley Stewart. Daunette & Damien Lee served on 4/1/2022, answer due 4/22/2022. (Brown, Marc) |
Filing 5
ORDER: The Hon. LaShann DeArcy Hall has assigned this case to me for all pretrial purposes. Enclosed is a copy of the Individual Rules of Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Both plaintiffs and defendants are required to follow them. Plaintiffs are to provide a copy of this Order and the enclosed rules to defendants along with the summons and complaint. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court -on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff - must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period. Plaintiff's complaint was filed on March 9, 2022. The 90-day clock began to run as of that date and will expire on June 7, 2022. Accordingly, if service is not made upon the defendants by June 7, 2022, or plaintiffs fail to show good cause why such service has not been effected, it will be recommended that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 3/16/2022. (Marino, Janine)
|
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Daunette & Damien Lee. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 FILING FEE: $ 402, receipt number 4653163679 (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Daunette & Damien Lee, filed by Norma Robinson, Audley Stewart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
