Molyn v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Bozena Molyn |
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. |
1:2022cv01356 |
March 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Robert M Levy |
Eric N Vitaliano |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Protective Order and Approving Stipulation. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 5/7/2022. (Levy, Robert) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION Stipulation to be So-Ordered re Confidentiality Stipulation from Supreme-Kings action is still in effect in EDNY matter by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Mand, Amneet) Modified on 5/7/2022 (Levy, Robert). |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Green on behalf of Bozena Molyn (aty to be noticed) (Green, Andrew) |
AMENDED Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy: Andrew Green, Amneet Mand. Scheduling order approved. Fact discovery deadline 9/27/22. Next conference 9/14/22 at 10:00 (status/settlement)(same dial-in number and access code) Initial Conference Hearing held on 4/27/2022. (Levy, Robert). |
Filing 9 Proposed Scheduling Order Completed Initial Conference Questionnaire by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Montgomery, Steven) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Pollack on behalf of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Pollack, David) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Amneet Mand on behalf of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Mand, Amneet) |
Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference by telephone has been scheduled for April 27, 2022 at 11:30 a.m., before the Honorable Robert M. Levy, United States Magistrate Judge at (888) 684-8852; Access Code #: 6223489. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 3/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 IC QUESTIONNAIRE, #2 INDIVIDUAL RULES) (Marino, Janine) |
Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. identifying Corporate Parent The Home Depot, Inc. for Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Montgomery, Steven) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Notice of Removal, by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Montgomery, Steven) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. from NY SUPREME COURT - KINGS COUNTY, case number 509290/2021. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15369207) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Affidavit of Service, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiff's Verified Complaint, #4 Exhibit Ex. D - Demand for Supplemental Statement of Damages) (Montgomery, Steven) |
Case Assigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Molyn v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bozena Molyn | |
Represented By: | Pawel Szymanski |
Represented By: | Andrew Green |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. | |
Represented By: | Steven Richard Montgomery |
Represented By: | Amneet Mand |
Represented By: | David M. Pollack |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.