Henry v. Arvelo et al
| Marie Nicole Betty Henry |
| Marie Yolene S Arvelo, Gabrielle Marvia Arvelo and Maxime Arvelo |
| 1:2022cv01380 |
| March 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nicholas G Garaufis |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marie Nicole Betty Henry. Gabrielle Marvia Arvelo served on 3/26/2022, answer due 4/16/2022. (Cajoux, Marjory) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marie Nicole Betty Henry. Marie Yolene S Arvelo served on 3/26/2022, answer due 4/16/2022. (Cajoux, Marjory) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marie Nicole Betty Henry. Maxime Arvelo served on 3/26/2022, answer due 4/16/2022. (Cajoux, Marjory) |
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: A Telephonic Initial Conference is scheduled for 8/9/2022 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. The parties are to call 877-336-1829 and type in the access code 3581283 for the AT&T conference bridge. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. The parties must complete the attached Joint Proposed Case Management Plan (CMP) and file it on ECF no later than 7/26/2022. In the event that any Defendant(s) has not answered or otherwise appeared, Plaintiff(s) must also mail a copy of this Order, its attachment and the full docket to the last known mailing address(es) for such Defendant(s) and file proof on ECF by the CMP filing date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 3/15/2022. (Quinlan, Krista)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Gabrielle Marvia Arvelo, Marie Yolene S Arvelo, Maxime Arvelo. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marie Nicole Betty Henry filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15371522 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Marie Nicole Betty Henry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Cajoux, Marjory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
