Prime Contractors Inc. v. APS Contractors Inc. et al
| Prime Contractors Inc. |
| APS Contractors Inc., Goce Blazeski and North American Specialty Insurance Company |
| 1:2022cv01581 |
| March 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| William F Kuntz |
| Ramon E Reyes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION of Service of North American Specialty Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss and supporting papers and FRCP Rule 7.1 Statement on March 13, 2022 by North American Specialty Insurance Company (Demas, Richard) |
| Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement by North American Specialty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Swiss Re Ltd, Corporate Parent Swiss Re America Holding Corporation, Corporate Parent Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd, Corporate Parent Swiss Re Reinsurance Holding Company Ltd for North American Specialty Insurance Company. (Demas, Richard) |
ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #16 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 5/6/2022. (Kang, Isen)
|
| Filing 16 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Defendant North American Specialty Insurance Company's second request for an extension of time to answer or move with respect to the complaint. Plaintiff does not object to the extension. by North American Specialty Insurance Company. (Demas, Richard) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Prime Contractors Inc.. North American Specialty Insurance Company served on 3/29/2022, answer due 5/6/2022. (Rayetsky, Max) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Prime Contractors Inc.. APS Contractors Inc. served on 3/25/2022, answer due 4/15/2022. (Rayetsky, Max) |
| Filing 13 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Prime Contractors Inc. as to North American Specialty Insurance Company. (Rayetsky, Max) |
| Filing 12 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Prime Contractors Inc. as to APS Contractors Inc.. (Rayetsky, Max) |
| Filing 11 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Defendant North American Specialty Insurance Company's request for an extension of time to answer or move with respect to the complaint. Plaintiff does not object to the extension. by North American Specialty Insurance Company. (Demas, Richard) |
|
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #11 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Defendant North American Specialty Insurance Company's request for an extension of time to answer or move with respect to the complaint. Plaintiff does not object to the All Defendants. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 4/19/2022. (Kuntz, William)
|
| Filing 10 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 9 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 NASIC summons, #2 Goce summons) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 7 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Prime Contractors Inc. (Rayetsky, Max) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case Assigned to Judge William F. Kuntz, II and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Manny A Frade on behalf of Prime Contractors Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Frade, Manny) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Max Rayetsky on behalf of Prime Contractors Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Rayetsky, Max) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Prime Contractors Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons) (Rayetsky, Max) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Prime Contractors Inc. (Rayetsky, Max) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Prime Contractors Inc. (Rayetsky, Max) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against APS Contractors Inc., Goce Blazeski, North American Specialty Insurance Company filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15400156 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Prime Contractors Inc.. (Rayetsky, Max) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
