Rodriguez v. 99 Cents Hot Pizza Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Fernando Rodriguez
Defendant: 99 Cents Hot Pizza Inc. doing business as 99 Cent Pizza, Abdul Quddas and Mohammad Rehman
Case Number: 1:2022cv01711
Filed: March 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brian M Cogan
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fernando Rodriguez. Abdul Quddas served on 5/3/2022, answer due 5/24/2022. (Sojo, Catalina)
May 12, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fernando Rodriguez. Mohammad Rehman served on 5/3/2022, answer due 5/24/2022. (Sojo, Catalina)
May 10, 2022 Minute Entry and Order for Initial Status Conference held on 05/10/2022 before Judge Brian M. Cogan. Counsel for plaintiff appeared; no appearance from defendants. Plaintiff is directed to file proof of service on the docket, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Weisberg, Peggy)
May 2, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Frank J Palermo on behalf of Fernando Rodriguez (aty to be noticed) (Palermo, Frank)
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic Initial Status Conference is set for 5/10/2022 at 3:30 pm. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852 followed by access code 6427877#. When the conference begins parties will be prompted to input the security code 1711#. See attached mandatory requirements for the conference. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 3/28/2022. (Weisberg, Peggy)
March 28, 2022 Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 28, 2022 Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 28, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Abdul summons, #2 Mohammad summons) (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 28, 2022 Filing 3 Proposed Summons.Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Fernando Rodriguez (Sojo, Catalina)
March 28, 2022 Filing 2 Proposed Summons.Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Fernando Rodriguez (Sojo, Catalina)
March 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 99 Cents Hot Pizza Inc., Abdul Quddas, Mohammad Rehman filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15413834 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Fernando Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons) (Sojo, Catalina)
March 28, 2022 Notice: Re: Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please submit Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 28, 2022 Incorrect Case/Document/Entry Information. The Civil Cover Sheet was not filled out correctly - specifically on page 2 the NY-E Division of Business Rule 50.1(d)(2)section of the document. Question 1 indicates YES, however, this is not a removal from NYS Court located in Suffolk or Nassau County. Counsel is directed to correct Civil Cover Sheet and resubmit. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 28, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. 99 Cents Hot Pizza Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fernando Rodriguez
Represented By: Catalina Sojo
Represented By: Frank J Palermo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 99 Cents Hot Pizza Inc. doing business as 99 Cent Pizza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Abdul Quddas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mohammad Rehman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?