Lin v. Cioppa et al
| Ling Lin |
| District Director Thomas Cioppa, USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou and Alejandro N. Mayorkas |
| 1:2022cv01988 |
| April 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. The time for the United States Attorney, as attorney for defendants, to show cause, in writing, why a writ of mandamus should not be issued, and to respond to the Complaint, is extended to June 27, 2022. Defendants shall serve a copy of the response to the order to show cause on plaintiff, with proof of such service to the Clerk of this Court. On or before July 26, 2022, plaintiff shall file her reply, if any, with proof of service to the Clerk of this Court. The oral argument scheduled for July 1, 2022, is adjourned sine die. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 5/17/2022. (Bacchi, Joseph)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 Order to Show Cause (Federal),,, , Consent MOTION to Adjourn Conference scheduled for July 1, 2022 to a date after July 26, 2022 by Thomas Cioppa, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas. (Cooper, David) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by David Allen Cooper on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Cooper, David) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ling Lin. Thomas Cioppa served on 4/8/2022, answer due 6/7/2022; Ur M. Jaddou served on 4/8/2022, answer due 6/7/2022; Alejandro N. Mayorkas served on 4/8/2022, answer due 6/7/2022. (Li, Ling) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and Electronic Service upon the US Attorneys Office re #1 Complaint. The United States Attorney, as attorney for defendants, is directed to show cause on or before 5/4/2022, in writing, why a writ of mandamus should not be issued, and shall serve a copy of the response on plaintiff, with proof of such service to the Clerk of this Court; On or before 6/1/2022, plaintiff shall file her reply, if any, with proof of service to the Clerk of this Court; Oral argument shall be heard on 7/1/2022 at 10:00 A.M. in courtroom 6F North before Judge Margo K. Brodie; Service of a copy of this Order, together with a copy of the complaint, shall be made by the Clerk of this Court via electronic case filing, to the United States Attorney and by mailing a copy of this Order to the plaintiff. So Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 4/7/2022. (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Ling Lin against Thomas Cioppa, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15451239 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Ling Lin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Li, Ling) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
