Bansal v. Mayorkas et al
Plaintiff: Meenu Bansal
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas, Thomas Cioppa, Merrick Garland, Tracy Renaud and Gina Pastore
Case Number: 1:2022cv02039
Filed: April 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brian M Cogan
Nature of Suit: Naturalization Application
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2022 Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by Thomas Cioppa, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Gina Pastore, Tracy Renaud (Price, Thomas)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Civil Case Terminated as per parties' Rule 41(a) stipulation. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 5/20/2022. (Cogan, Brian)
April 19, 2022 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Meenu Bansal. Thomas Cioppa served on 4/18/2022, answer due 5/9/2022; Merrick Garland served on 4/18/2022, answer due 5/9/2022; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 4/18/2022, answer due 5/9/2022; Gina Pastore served on 4/18/2022, answer due 5/9/2022; Tracy Renaud served on 4/18/2022, answer due 5/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Defendant Pastore AAG Brooklyn, #2 Certificate of Service Defendant Pastore D.C, #3 Certificate of Service Defendant Cioppa AAG, #4 Certificate of Service Defendant Cioppa D.C, #5 Certificate of Service Defendant Garland D.C, #6 Certificate of Service Defendant Garland AGG, #7 Certificate of Service Defendant Renaud AGG, #8 Certificate of Service Defendant Renaud D.C, #9 Certificate of Service Defendant Mayorkas AGG, #10 Certificate of Service Defendant Mayorkas D.C) (Konan, Ryanne)
April 18, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Russell Price on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Price, Thomas)
April 12, 2022 Filing 9 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
April 12, 2022 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear before the Honorable Brian M. Cogan for a telephonic Initial Status Conference on 5/24/2022 at 1:30 pm. Parties are directed to use the toll-free number 888-684-8852, access code 6427877# and security code 2039#. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to notify all attorneys in this action of the conference schedule in writing. No later than 24 hours prior to the Initial Status Conference, the Government must file a brief letter advising the Court whether the status of the case has changed since the filing of the complaint. Counsel is directed to review Judge Cogan's Individual Practices, which may be obtained on the Court's website at https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/content/judge-brian-m-cogan. Requests for adjournment of the conference will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Judge Cogan's Rules. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 4/12/2022. (Weisberg, Peggy)
April 11, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
April 11, 2022 Filing 7 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Meenu Bansal (Konan, Ryanne)
April 11, 2022 Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/12/2022: #1 Additional Corrections) (Jakubowski, Laura).
April 11, 2022 Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Meenu Bansal (Konan, Ryanne)
April 11, 2022 Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Meenu Bansal (Konan, Ryanne)
April 11, 2022 Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla)
April 8, 2022 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Meenu Bansal (Bowens, Priscilla)
April 8, 2022 Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Thomas Cioppa, MERRICK GARLAND, Alejandro Mayorkas, GINA PASTORE, TRACY RENAUD, filed by MEENU BANSAL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Konan, Ryanne)
April 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Thomas Cioppa, MERRICK GARLAND, Alejandro Mayorkas, GINA PASTORE, TRACY RENAUD filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15458149 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by MEENU BANSAL. (Konan, Ryanne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bansal v. Mayorkas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meenu Bansal
Represented By: Ryanne Guy Konan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Thomas Russell Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Cioppa
Represented By: Thomas Russell Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick Garland
Represented By: Thomas Russell Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tracy Renaud
Represented By: Thomas Russell Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gina Pastore
Represented By: Thomas Russell Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?