Walker v. Transunion Credit Bureau et al
| Ross Daniel Walker |
| Transunion Credit Bureau, Premier Members, Equifax Fraud Department and Experian Credit Bureau |
| 1:2022cv02246 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
CLERK'S JUDGMENT dated 6/7/2022 that that this action is dismissed; that pursuant to 28:1915(a)(3), any appeal would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). ( Ordered by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on behalf of Brenna B. Mahoney, Clerk of Court on 6/7/2022 ) c/m to plaintiff w/appeals pkg. (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. The Clerk of Court is also respectfully requested to mail a copy of this Order to the plaintiff and to note the mailing on the docket. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 6/6/2022. (Greene, Donna)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. If the plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within that time, then judgment dismissing this action will enter. the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this order to the plaintiff and to note the mailing on the docket. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 4/28/2022. (Greene, Donna)
|
|
Filing 4
Letter dated 4/20/2022 from Ross Daniel Walker, plaintiff pro se requesting a private hearing and does not wish to have a jury trial. (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
|
Filing 3
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ross Daniel Walker. (Davis, Kimberly)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Equifax Fraud Department, Experian Credit Bureau, Premier Members, Transunion Credit Bureau, filed by Ross Daniel Walker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
