Shengelia v. Nissan-Infiniti LT et al
Merab Shengelia |
Nissan-Infiniti LT, Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Irene Gold and Vladimir Gold |
1:2022cv02270 |
April 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Diane Gujarati |
Robert M Levy |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER DISMISSING PARTIES -- As stipulated and agreed by and between the parties in the #14 STIPULATION of Dismissal filed on May 27, 2022, this action - including all cross-claims, if any - is hereby dismissed with prejudice as against Defendants Nissan-Infiniti LT and Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, without costs. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 5/31/2022. (Almonte, Kelly) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Nissan-Infiniti LT (Aaron, Clifford) |
Filing 13 Letter in Response to Defendant's Pre-Motion Letter by Merab Shengelia (Bogoraz, Karine) |
ORDER re: #7 Letter for Pre-Motion Conference: On April 28, 2022, Defendants Nissan-Infiniti LT and Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation filed a #7 Letter for Pre-Motion Conference requesting a pre-motion conference with respect to their anticipated motion. Plaintiff failed to file a response within the timeframe set forth in the undersigned's Individual Practice Rules. See Individual Practice Rule III.A. Accordingly, by Order dated May 11, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' #7 Letter for Pre-Motion Conference by May 13, 2022. Plaintiff failed to do so and has not filed a response to date. Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to file a response to Defendants' #7 Letter for Pre-Motion Conference by May 23, 2022, or to set forth, in writing, by that date the reason for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's orders. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 5/19/2022. (Almonte, Kelly) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy: Counsel present by telephone. (1) Case management order adopted. Discovery deadlines: 11/21/22 fact; 1/20/23 plaintiff's expert disclosure; remainder to be determined. (2) Plaintiff agrees to dismiss the claims against the Nissan defendants, thus mooting the Nissan defendants' pre-motion conference request. A stipulation of dismissal shall be filed in 21 days. (3) Next conference 10/19/22 at 10:00 (same dial-in number and access code)(status/settlement).Initial Conference Hearing held on 5/19/2022 (Levy, Robert) |
Filing 12 Proposed Scheduling Order by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Nissan-Infiniti LT (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Letter regarding submission) (Finkelstein, Matthew) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Kory Finkelstein on behalf of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Nissan-Infiniti LT (aty to be noticed) (Finkelstein, Matthew) |
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Adjourn Conference. The telephone conference scheduled for 5/19/22 at 2PM is adjourned to 3:30 p.m., on the same date. Parties are directed to call 888-684-8852 and use access code # 6223489. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 5/18/2022. (Marino, Janine) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Adjourn Conference by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Nissan-Infiniti LT. (Aaron, Clifford) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Karine Bogoraz on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Bogoraz, Karine) |
ORDER re: #7 Letter for Pre-Motion Conference -- On April 28, 2022, Defendants Nissan-Infiniti LT and Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation filed a #7 Letter for Pre-Motion Conference requesting a pre-motion conference with respect to their anticipated motion. To date, Plaintiff has failed to file a response, as required by the undersigned's Individual Practice Rules. See Individual Practice Rule III.A. Plaintiff is directed to respond to Defendants' #7 Letter for Pre-Motion Conference by May 13, 2022. Counsel are reminded that any request for relief must be docketed as a motion on ECF. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 5/11/2022. (Almonte, Kelly) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph H. Mcspedon on behalf of Irene Gold, Vladimir Gold (aty to be noticed) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service) (Mcspedon, Joseph) |
Filing 7 Letter for Pre-Motion Conference by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Nissan-Infiniti LT (Aaron, Clifford) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Nissan-Infiniti LT re #1 Notice of Removal,, (Aaron, Clifford) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference by telephone has been scheduled for May 19, 2022 at 2:00 p.m., before the Honorable Robert M. Levy, United States Magistrate Judge at (888) 684-8852; Access Code #: 6223489. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 4/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 IC QUESTIONNAIRE, #2 INDIVIDUAL RULES) (Marino, Janine) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Nissan-Infiniti LT identifying Corporate Parent Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. for Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Nissan-Infiniti LT. (Aaron, Clifford) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Nissan-Infiniti LT (Aaron, Clifford) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Nissan-Infiniti LT from Supreme Court, Kings County, case number 502641/2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15493955) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Answer by Nissan-Infiniti LT LLC and Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC, #3 Exhibit Answer by Irene Gold and Vladimir Gold, #4 Exhibit Preliminary Conference Order, #5 Exhibit Order Granting Motion to Compel, #6 Exhibit Response to Demand for Ad Damnum, #7 Exhibit Consent for Removal) (Aaron, Clifford) |
This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Case Assigned to Judge Diane Gujarati and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.