Wang v. Mayorkas et al
| Jun Wang |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Timothy Houghton, US Citizenship and Immigration Services and Scott Velez |
| 1:2022cv02496 |
| May 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert W. Schumacher, II on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Schumacher, Robert) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jun Wang. Timothy Houghton served on 5/5/2022, answer due 7/4/2022; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 5/5/2022, answer due 7/4/2022; US Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 5/5/2022, answer due 7/4/2022; Scott Velez served on 5/5/2022, answer due 7/4/2022. (Layne, Monique) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Scott Velez, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 FILING FEE: $ 402.00, receipt number 4653164895 (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Scott Velez, filed by Jun Wang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
