Hayes v. Persad
| Katherine Hayes |
| Christopher Persad |
| 1:2022cv02501 |
| May 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| William F Kuntz |
| Taryn A Merkl |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Minute Entry and Order: A telephonic Initial Conference was held on 6/15/2022 before Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl. Appearances by Anthony Forzano for Plaintiff; Atasia Richardson for Defendant. The parties represented that they have already completed their Rule 26(f) conference. The parties' proposed discovery schedule is adopted, in part, as follows. The parties are directed to exchange their initial disclosures and medical authorizations by 6/17/2022. First requests for production of documents and interrogatories are due by 6/17/2022. Phase I discovery shall be completed by 8/15/2022. Fact discovery shall be completed by 9/14/2022. The deadline to file a status report on ECF certifying the close of fact discovery is 9/14/2022. The deadline to join new parties or amend the pleadings as of right is 9/15/2022. The parties are directed to exchange expert disclosures by 10/14/2022. Expert depositions shall be completed by 11/14/2022. Rebuttal expert reports shall be exchanged by 1/1/2023. Expert discovery shall be completed by 1/15/2023. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 2/15/2023 certifying the close of all discovery. The deadline to initiate any dispositive motions is 3/15/2023, and should be done in accordance with the Individual Rules of the assigned District Judge. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 8/22/2022 indicating their progress as to discovery and settlement discussions, and whether the parties would like a referral to the EDNY Mediation Program, or a pre-settlement conference before the Court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl on 6/15/2022. (AT&T Log #9:38-9:56.) (Devanathan, Deepa)
|
| Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (Richardson, Atasia) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: The telephonic Initial Conference on 6/14/2022 at 9:30 a.m. will now be held on 6/15/2022 at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number (877) 336-1839. The access code is 3914302. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the scheduled conference. Counsel are directed to complete the Case Management Worksheet #8 and electronically file same with the Court no later than 6/8/2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl on 6/1/2022. (Devanathan, Deepa)
|
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic Initial Conference will be held on 6/14/2022 at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number (877) 336-1839. The access code is 3914302. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the scheduled conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Case Management Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than 6/7/2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl on 5/11/2022. (Chan, Kaity)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by All Defendants. (Richardson, Atasia) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony J. Forzano on behalf of All Plaintiffs (notification declined or already on case) (Forzano, Anthony) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Christopher Persad (Richardson, Atasia) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case Assigned to Judge William F. Kuntz, II and Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet (MISSING SECOND PAGE FORM). All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Atasia Rashae Richardson on behalf of Christopher Persad (notification declined or already on case) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Richardson, Atasia) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Richmond County Supreme Court, case number 150499/2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15526764) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Richardson, Atasia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hayes v. Persad | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Katherine Hayes | |
| Represented By: | Anthony J. Forzano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Christopher Persad | |
| Represented By: | Atasia Rashae Richardson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
