Hoque v. Trans Union, LLC
| Farjana Hoque |
| Trans Union, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Information Services LLC and Discover Bank |
| 1:2022cv02751 |
| May 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Robert M Levy |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Compel by Discover Bank. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Defendant Discover Bank's Motion to Compel Arbitration, #2 Declaration ISO Motion to Compel Arbitration, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B) (Indych, Marsha) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative and Other Defenses by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Stieber, Courtney) |
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time until July 7, 2022 for defendant Discover Bank to Answer. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 6/23/2022. (Marino, Janine)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Discover Bank. (Indych, Marsha) |
| Filing 13 Defendant Experian's ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative and Other Defenses by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Trouba, Rachel) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Equifax Information Services LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, , Consent to Removal (Stieber, Courtney) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equifax Information Services LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services LLC. (Stieber, Courtney) |
| Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, Complaint by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Stieber, Courtney) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Notice of Consent to Removal by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.) (Trouba, Rachel) |
| Filing 8 Trans Union, LLC's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Trans Union, LLC. (Nicodemus, Camille) |
|
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Equifax answer due by 7/1/22. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 5/18/2022. (Marino, Janine)
|
|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time until June 17, 2022 for Defendant Experian Information Solutions to Answer. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 5/18/2022. (Marino, Janine)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Trouba, Rachel) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate VantageScore Solutions LLC for Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Trouba, Rachel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel Trouba on behalf of Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Trouba, Rachel) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Trans Union, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Trans Union Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent TransUnion, Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for Trans Union, LLC. (Nicodemus, Camille) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Trans Union, LLC from Civil Court of City of New York, County of Queens, case number 008605. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15557361) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons to Trans Union, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint to Trans Union, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nicodemus, Camille) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
