Elsirafy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Ibrahim Elsirafy
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser-NY, LLC and Alexa Martinez
Case Number: 1:2022cv02795
Filed: May 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Carol Bagley Amon
Referring Judge: Robert M Levy
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ibrahim Elsirafy. Alexa Martinez served on 6/23/2022, answer due 7/14/2022. (Hutt, Didi)
July 1, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Didi Hutt on behalf of Ibrahim Elsirafy (notification declined or already on case) (Hutt, Didi)
June 30, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Randi Alison Wolf on behalf of Alexa Martinez (aty to be noticed) (Wolf, Randi)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference by telephone has been scheduled for August 2, 2022 at 3:30 p.m., before the Honorable Robert M. Levy, United States Magistrate Judge at (888) 684-8852; Access Code #: 6223489. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 6/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 IC QUESTIONNAIRE, #2 INDIVIDUAL RULES) (Marino, Janine)
June 1, 2022 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint , CROSSCLAIM against Ibrahim Elsirafy by Raiser-NY, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Jenks, Timothy)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: Defendants shall have until June 2, 2022 to file their Answer. SO ORDERED by Judge Carol Bagley Amon on May 20, 2022. (Shire, Emily)
May 19, 2022 Filing 4 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer To Complaint by Raiser-NY, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Jenks, Timothy)
May 13, 2022 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
May 13, 2022 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
May 13, 2022 This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Davis, Kimberly)
May 13, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Carol Bagley Amon and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)
May 12, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier-NY, LLC from Supreme Court State of New York County of Queens, case number 726854/2021. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15562441) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit Email Correspondence, #3 Certificate of Service Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Certificate of Service Civil Cover Sheet, #6 FRCP 7.1 Disclosure Statement) (Jenks, Timothy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elsirafy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ibrahim Elsirafy
Represented By: Didi Hutt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Timothy Jenks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raiser-NY, LLC
Represented By: Timothy Jenks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alexa Martinez
Represented By: Randi Alison Wolf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?