Krisa v. Long Island Rail Road Company
| Michael Krisa |
| Long Island Rail Road Company |
| 1:2022cv02836 |
| May 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: The Court shall hold the initial conference by telephone in plaintiff's Federal Employers Liability Act case on August 2, 2022 at 10:30 a.m. The parties shall call the Chambers telephone conference line at (888) 363-4734 and use the access code 4444221 promptly at 10:30 a.m. The parties shall exchange their Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures and file their Rule 26(f) Meeting Report with the Court by July 26, 2022. Parties are advised that they must contact each other before making any request for an adjournment to the Court. Any request for an adjournment must be electronically filed with the Court at least seventy-two (72) hours before the scheduled conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 7/7/2022. (Yindra, Hannah)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Long Island Rail Road Company. (Chiofolo, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Long Island Rail Road Company identifying Corporate Parent Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Other Affiliate MTA New York City Transit, Other Affiliate MTA Staten Island Railway, Other Affiliate MTA Capital Construction, Other Affiliate MTA Bus Company, Other Affiliate MTA Bridges and Tunnels, Other Affiliate MTA Metro North Commuter Railroad for Long Island Rail Road Company. (Chiofolo, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom for all further proceedings. Judge Brian M. Cogan no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Guzzi, Roseann) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Michael Krisa. (Lauriello, Valerie) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Krisa. Long Island Rail Road Company served on 5/26/2022, answer due 6/16/2022. (Lauriello, Valerie) |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic Initial Status Conference is set for 6/28/2022 at 10:30 am. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852, access code 6427877# and security code 2836#. See attached mandatory requirements for the conference. In addition, plaintiff is directed to serve on defendant a complete set of medical releases and authorizations together with the summons and complaint. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 5/16/2022. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Long Island Rail Road Company. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Long Island Rail Road Company filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15568303 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by MICHAEL KRISA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lauriello, Valerie) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Krisa v. Long Island Rail Road Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Krisa | |
| Represented By: | Valerie J. Lauriello |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Long Island Rail Road Company | |
| Represented By: | Thomas L. Chiofolo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
