West Coast Servicing Inc. v. Alam et al
| West Coast Servicing Inc. |
| Mohammed N. Alam, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE |
| 1:2022cv02881 |
| May 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Taryn A Merkl |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Default |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, filed May 16, 2022 by All Defendants. (Spivak, Lawrence) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION re #9 Letter Extension of time to Answer by Mohammed N. Alam, Jane Doe, John Doe (Spivak, Lawrence) |
| Filing 9 Letter Regarding extension request by Mohammed N. Alam, Jane Doe, John Doe (Spivak, Lawrence) |
ORDER: The parties' #9 joint request for extension of time to file an answer is granted nunc pro tunc. The Court interprets the #9 letter as a request for extension as to all Defendants. Accordingly, the new deadline as to all Defendants to file an Answer is July 15, 2022. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 7/13/2022. (Kim, Eliot)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence George Spivak on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Spivak, Lawrence) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer by West Coast Servicing Inc. (Light, Danielle) |
|
ORDER: The parties' #7 stipulation extending time to answer is deficient for several reasons. First, counsel for defendants must enter a notice of appearance before representing his purported clients in proceedings, a requirement that extends to submissions of signed stipulations on ECF. Second, parties are directed to review the Court's individual rules of practice. Specifically, Rule 1.G explains that requests for extensions must be submitted in writing and include (1) the original deadline; (2) the number of previous requests for extensions; (3) whether these previous requests were granted or denied; and (4) whether the opposing counsel consents and, if not, the reasons given by the opposing counsel for refusing to consent. Rule 1.G also makes clear that requests for extension should be made at least two working days prior to the deadline. Therefore, the parties are directed to file a letter on ECF that complies with this order if they are seeking an extension of the time to answer. Finally, given that defense counsel may not yet be signed up to receive ECF notifications for this case, the Court requests that plaintiff's counsel forward the notification of this order to defense counsel. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 6/28/2022. (Kim, Eliot)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by West Coast Servicing Inc.. John Doe served on 6/1/2022, answer due 6/22/2022. (Light, Danielle) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by West Coast Servicing Inc.. Mohammed N. Alam served on 6/10/2022, answer due 7/1/2022; Jane Doe served on 6/4/2022, answer due 6/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service Affidavit of Service by Mail) (Hasbani, Rafi) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mohammed N. Alam, Jane Doe, John Doe. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15573286, filed by West Coast Servicing Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Summons in a Civil Action, #3 Proposed Summons Summons Rider, #4 Rule 26(a) Disclosure Corporate Disclosure, #5 Exhibit A- Schedule A/Legal Description, #6 Exhibit B- Note, #7 Exhibit C- Mortgage, #8 Exhibit D- Chain of Title/ AOM, #9 Exhibit E- Notices, #10 RPAPL 1303 Notice, #11 RPAPL 1320 Notice) (Hasbani, Rafi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
