Martuscello v. Systems & Services Technologies, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jane Martuscello
Defendant: Systems & Services Technologies, Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv02883
Filed: May 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: James R Cho
Referring Judge: Allyne R Ross
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #8 Motion to Adjourn Conference. The Telephonic Initial Conference previously scheduled for 7/7/2022 is adjourned to 8/8/2022 at 10:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. The deadline to submit the proposed scheduling order is extended to 8/4/2022. The parties are directed to call toll free (888) 808-6929 and use access code 1065334. Adjournment requests will not be considered unless made in accordance with this Court's Individual Rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 6/6/2022. (Gillespie-Cardo, Saudia)
June 3, 2022 Filing 8 Consent MOTION to Adjourn Conference by Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.. (Salvo, Cindy)
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: A Telephonic Initial Conference will be held at 12:00 p.m. on 7/7/2022 before Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. Counsel for all parties must participate. Counsel for defendant is directed to immediately confirm this conference date and time with plaintiff's counsel. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Proposed Scheduling Order and electronically file same with the Court no later than 7/5/2022. Each party is directed to call toll free (888) 808-6929 and use access code 1065334. Adjournment requests will not be considered unless made in accordance with this Court's Individual Rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 5/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Chamber's Individual Rules) (Gillespie-Cardo, Saudia)
May 24, 2022 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Systems & Services Technologies, Inc. (Salvo, Cindy)
May 24, 2022 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.. (Salvo, Cindy)
May 19, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Maksim Reznik on behalf of Jane Martuscello (aty to be noticed) (Reznik, Maksim)
May 18, 2022 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
May 18, 2022 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
May 18, 2022 This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Davis, Kimberly)
May 18, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)
May 17, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Systems & Services Technologies, Inc. from Supreme Court of the State of New York, Saratoga County, case number EF2022864. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15574239) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Salvo, Cindy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martuscello v. Systems & Services Technologies, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Martuscello
Represented By: Vishal Mehta
Represented By: Maksim Reznik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Cindy D. Salvo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?