Wang v. Houghton et al
| Dong Qin Wang |
| NY District Director Timothy Houghton, US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas and Texas Service Center |
| 1:2022cv02968 |
| May 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Rachel P Kovner |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by Merrick Garland, Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Texas Service Center (Cooper, David) |
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Please see the stipulation of dismissal #8 . The case is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 7/13/2022. (Daus, Benjamin)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Marilia G Richards on behalf of Dong Qin Wang (aty to be noticed) (Richards, Marilia) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dong Qin Wang. Merrick Garland served on 5/31/2022, answer due 7/30/2022; Timothy Houghton served on 5/31/2022, answer due 7/30/2022; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 5/31/2022, answer due 7/30/2022; Texas Service Center served on 5/31/2022, answer due 7/30/2022. (Jia, Jason) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David Allen Cooper on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Cooper, David) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Texas Service Center, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference will be held by telephone before Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 7/19/2022 at 10:30 a.m. The parties are directed to call (888) 278-0296 and enter the access code 2012636 to join the conference. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 5/20/2022. (Daus, Benjamin)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Merrick Garland, Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Texas Service Center filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15583592 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Dong Qin Wang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit Exhibits) (Jia, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
