Bernazard v. Miller
| Jose Bernazard |
| Superintendent Mark Miller |
| 1:2022cv03176 |
| May 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret Ann Cieprisz on behalf of Mark Miller (aty to be noticed) (Cieprisz, Margaret) |
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of pro se Petitioner's #4 June 17, 2022 letter, noting that the judges assigned to this matter have each handled a prior case filed my Petitioner, and asking if it is normal practice in this district for judges to be assigned to cases related to prior cases they have handled. The answer to Petitioner's question is yes, it is standard practice in this district for the same judges to be assigned to all cases filed by the same pro se petitioner. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 6/27/2022. (Stephan, Keegan)
|
| Filing 4 Letter dated 6/17/2022 from pro se Jose Bernazard, seeking the Court's information and assistance regarding Petitioner's 2254 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Petitioner is granted #2 leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Attorney General of the State of New York or the District Attorney of Queens County, as attorney for Respondent, shall show cause before this Court, by the filing of a return to the #1 Petition, why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued. Within sixty (60) days of receipt of this Order to Show Cause, Respondent shall serve a copy of the return on Petitioner herein and file the original thereof with the Court, together with proof of service. Petitioner, within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of a copy of the return, shall file his or her reply, if any, with the Court. SO ORDERED by Judge Pamela K. Chen, on 6/14/2022. C/mailed to pro se Petitioner. Electronic Service upon Respondents, re: this Order to Show Cause and Petitioner's #1 Petition for A Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jose Bernazard. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus , filed by Jose Bernazard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bernazard v. Miller | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jose Bernazard | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Superintendent Mark Miller | |
| Represented By: | NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC |
| Represented By: | QUEENS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC |
| Represented By: | Margaret Ann Cieprisz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
