United States of America v. Portorreal et al
United States of America |
Melida Portorreal and International Travel Multi & Tax Corp. |
1:2022cv03191 |
May 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Hector Gonzalez |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by All Defendants. (Seidler, Bernard) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by United States of America. International Travel Multi & Tax Corp. waiver sent on 6/3/2022, answer due 8/2/2022. (Ashby, Eric) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by United States of America. Melida Portorreal waiver sent on 6/3/2022, answer due 8/2/2022. (Ashby, Eric) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Bernard Alan Seidler on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Seidler, Bernard) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear before Judge Gonzalez for an initial status conference in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 on August 17, 2022 at 11:30AM in a courtroom to be determined. The parties are directed to comply with the attached mandatory requirements, including filing on the docket a joint letter describing the case and a completed civil case management plan prior to the conference. Requests for adjournment of the initial status conference will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Section I.D of Judge Gonzalez's Individual Practices. The parties are further ordered to file any pre-motion letters within 30 days of the filing of Defendants' answer on ECF. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 6/1/2022. (Nkodo, Julie-Irene) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 ITMT summons) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against International Travel Multi & Tax Corp., Melida Portorreal Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons for Melida Portorreal, #3 Proposed Summons for International Travel Multi & Tax Corp.) (Ashby, Eric) |
Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.