United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. iFresh, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: iFresh, Inc. and Long Deng
Case Number: 1:2022cv03200
Filed: May 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Sanket J Bulsara
Referring Judge: Allyne R Ross
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER: The motion for extension of time to answer #11 is granted. Defendant Long Deng shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint by 8/15/2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 7/28/2022. (Morrow, Emily)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Long Deng. (Ni, Angus)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by iFresh, Inc. (Gorman, Daniel)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel E. Gorman on behalf of iFresh, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Gorman, Daniel)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by United States Securities and Exchange Commission. iFresh, Inc. waiver sent on 6/16/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. (Guardi, Ariella)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Long Deng waiver sent on 6/1/2022, answer due 7/31/2022. (Guardi, Ariella)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ariella Guardi on behalf of United States Securities and Exchange Commission (notification declined or already on case) (Guardi, Ariella)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER: The Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #5 by attorney Ariella Guardi is hereby granted. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerk's Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 6/7/2022. (Morrow, Emily)
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150. by United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Ariella Guardi) (Guardi, Ariella)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Deng summons) (Bowens, Priscilla)
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Long Deng, iFresh, Inc. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons for iFresh, Inc., #3 Proposed Summons for Long Deng) (Qualls, Alyssa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. iFresh, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: Alyssa Anne Qualls
Represented By: Ariella Guardi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: iFresh, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel E. Gorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Long Deng
Represented By: Angus Ni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?