State of New York v. Vidal-Bey
Plaintiff: State of New York
Defendant: India Iman Vidal-Bey
Case Number: 1:2022cv03529
Filed: June 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Pamela K Chen
Referring Judge: Marcia M Henry
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted solely for the purpose of this Order. For the reasons explained in the attached Memorandum & Order, this action is dismissed. However, in light of Defendant Vidal-Bey's pro se status, the Court grants Defendant leave to file an amended notice of removal within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. All further proceedings shall be stayed for thirty (30) days. If Defendant does not file an amended notice of removal within thirty (30) days or show good cause why she cannot comply, the Court shall direct the Clerk of Court to enter judgment and close this case. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 7/21/2022. (Stephan, Keegan)
July 7, 2022 Filing 5 Notice, Consent, And Reference Of A Civil Action To A Magistrate Judge; filed by pro se India Iman Vidal-Bey, dated 7/4/2022. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
July 7, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; filed by pro se India Iman Vidal-Bey, dated 7/4/2022. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
June 16, 2022 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
June 16, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. Document mailed. (Bowens, Priscilla)
June 13, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by India Iman Vidal-Bey (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: State of New York v. Vidal-Bey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: State of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: India Iman Vidal-Bey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?