In Re: In the Matter of the Complaint of Wittich Bros. Marine, Inc.
In Re: In the Matter of the Complaint of Wittich Bros. Marine, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv03838
Filed: June 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Pamela K Chen
Referring Judge: Brian M Cogan
2 Judge: Ramon E Reyes
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 46 U.S.C. ยง 741 Shipping
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2022 Incomplete ACO Case Termination/Statistical/Non Reportable Closing. (Gonzalez, Fida)
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER: Having taken into consideration both equity and judicial economy, the Court consolidates the following cases pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: In Re: In the Matter of the Complaint of Coeymans Marine Towing LLC, 22-CV-3826, and In Re: In the Matter of the Complaint of Wittich Bros. Marine, Inc., 22-CV-3838. See Devlin v. Transportation Commc'ns Int'l Union, 175 F.3d 121, 130 (2d Cir. 1999). All filings should be made in the lead case, 22-CV-3826. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to consolidate these cases and terminate docket 22-CV-3838. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 8/19/2022. (Stephan, Keegan)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr for all further proceedings. Judge Brian M. Cogan no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 8/11/2022. (Bowens, Priscilla)
August 10, 2022 Set/Reset Hearing: Initial Status Conference set for 5:30 pm on 8/11/2022 is reset to 1:30 pm. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852 followed by access code 6427877#. When the conference begins parties will be prompted to input the security code 3838#. (Weisberg, Peggy)
August 9, 2022 Filing 10 STATUS REPORT by In the Matter of the Complaint of Wittich Bros. Marine, Inc. (Wolfson, Garth)
July 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic Initial Status Conference is set for 8/11/2022 at 5:30 pm. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852 followed by access code 6427877#. When the conference begins parties will be prompted to input the security code 3838#. See attached mandatory requirements for the conference. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/1/2022. (Weisberg, Peggy)
June 30, 2022 Filing 8 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
June 30, 2022 Filing 7 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
June 30, 2022 Filing 6 Civil Cover Sheet.. by In the Matter of the Complaint of Wittich Bros. Marine, Inc. (Wolfson, Garth)
June 30, 2022 Filing 5 Proposed Pretrial Order Notice to Claimants by Wittich Bros. Marine, Inc. (Wolfson, Garth)
June 30, 2022 Filing 4 Proposed Pretrial Order for Stipulation of Value by Wittich Bros. Marine, Inc. (Wolfson, Garth)
June 30, 2022 Filing 3 Ad Interim Stipulation BOND in the amount of $ $620,500.00 posted by Wittich Bros. Marine, Inc. (Wolfson, Garth)
June 30, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wittich Bros. Marine, Inc. (Wolfson, Garth)
June 30, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Parties filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15706805 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Wittich Bros. Marine, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) (Wolfson, Garth)
June 30, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
June 30, 2022 Notice: Re: Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please submit Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: In the Matter of the Complaint of Wittich Bros. Marine, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: In the Matter of the Complaint of Wittich Bros. Marine, Inc.
Represented By: Garth S. Wolfson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?