Caggiano v. New York City Department of Education et al
| Mario Caggiano |
| New York City Department of Education, Carmen Amador, Audrey Houston and Evan Rabinowitz |
| 1:2022cv03853 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Rachel P Kovner |
| Taryn A Merkl |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: The Court sets the following briefing schedule on defendants' motion to dismiss at #10 . Plaintiff's opposition brief due 12/7/2022. Defendants' reply brief, if any, due 12/21/2022. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 11/5/2022. (de Carvalho, Simon)
|
| Filing 10 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Carmen Amador, Audrey Houston, New York City Department of Education, Evan Rabinowitz. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Rule 12.1 notice) (Rhau, Karen) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Karen Rhau on behalf of Carmen Amador, Audrey Houston, Evan Rabinowitz (aty to be noticed) (Rhau, Karen) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION of Service of Documents to Pro Se Litigant by New York City Department of Education (Rhau, Karen) |
|
ORDER: Defendant's motion for extension of time at #7 is granted in part. Defendant shall file its answer to plaintiff's complaint by 11/3/2022. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 9/30/2022. (de Carvalho, Simon)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File by New York City Department of Education. (Rhau, Karen) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Karen Rhau on behalf of New York City Department of Education (aty to be noticed) (Rhau, Karen) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to serve Defendants with the Summons and Complaint by 12/5/2022, and to file proof of service with the Court. As discussed in the attached Order, if service is not made upon Defendants by 12/5/2022 or Plaintiff fails to show good cause why such service has not been effected, it will be recommended that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl on 9/15/2022. (Devanathan, Deepa)
|
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mario Caggiano. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Mario Caggiano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
