A.S. v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
| A.S. |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, New York Asylum Office (USCIS), Director Ur M. Jaddou, Acting Assoc.Dir Ted H. Kim, Chief Andrew Davidson, Associate Director Matthew D. Emrich and Director Patricia Menges |
| 1:2022cv03893 |
| July 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Frederic Block |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ELECTRONIC ORDER DISMISSING CASE: See entry #16 . Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 8/15/2022. (Innelli, Michael)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by Andrew Davidson, Matthew D. Emrich, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia Menges, New York Asylum Office (USCIS), United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) (Volpe, Christopher) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Daniel Volpe on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Volpe, Christopher) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel G. Balaban on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Balaban, Rachel) |
| Filing 13 APPROVAL re #11 Motion for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically. The duplicate payment made on 7/1/2022 has been verified. The $402.00 filing fee; receipt no ANYEDC-15712678 is to be refunded. Signed Brenna B. Mahoney, Clerk of Court by Tiffeny Lee-Harris, Case Administration Manager, 7/12/22022. (Lee, Tiffeny) |
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgement filed by A.S.., AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; Alexander Mayorkas; New York Asylum Office, USCIS; Ur Mendoza Jaddou; Ted Kim; Andrew Davidson; Matthew Emrich; Patricia Menges on July 7, 2022, filed by A.S.. (Sutton, Jennifer) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically by A.S.. (Sutton, Jennifer) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Sutton on behalf of A.S. (notification declined or already on case) (Sutton, Jennifer) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by A.S. re Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice,, (Sutton, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Granting plaintiff's motion #1 to proceed anonymously. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 7/5/2022. (Innelli, Michael)
|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
|
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Granting Jennifer Sutton's motion #3 for leave to appear Pro Hac Vice. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that she receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the 150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee.Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 7/5/2022. (Innelli, Michael)
|
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: If multiple defendants, there must me a rider attached to the summons with the name and addresses of all defendants included., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15712723 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by A.S.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Civil Cover Sheet) (Sutton, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-15712658. by A.S.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support, #2 Appendix) (Sutton, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by A.S. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Proposed Summons, #8 Proposed Summons) (Sutton, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Protective Order by A.S.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sutton, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
