Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.161.123.48
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant: John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.161.123.48
Case Number: 1:2022cv03941
Filed: July 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: James R Cho
Referring Judge: Rachel P Kovner
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2022 Opinion or Order STATUS REPORT ORDER: Counsel is directed to file an updated status report letter by 12/6/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 8/22/2022. (Cho, James)
August 19, 2022 Filing 10 STATUS REPORT by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Atkin, John)
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Discovery Order. The Motion for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference is granted. The parties shall refer to the attached Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 7/20/2022. (Sorice, Laura)
July 19, 2022 Filing 8 Letter clarifying that Plaintiff intends to issue subpoena on Spectrum by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (revised)) (Atkin, John)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference #7 . However, it is unclear whether plaintiff seeks to subpoena the internet-service provider Spectrum or Verizon Fios because plaintiff's application references both providers. Compare Motion, Dkt. 7 at ECF page 1 (Plaintiff "moves for entry of an order granting it leave to serve a third party subpoena on Spectrum.... ") and Memorandum of Law, Dkt. 7-1 at ECF page 7 ("Plaintiff now seeks leave to serve limited discovery on Does ISP, Spectrum ('Spectrum')...."); with Proposed Order, Dkt. 7-5 at ECF page 1 ("seeking permission to serve a subpoena upon Verizon Fios, the Doe Defendant's Internet Service Provider ('ISP')...."). By 7/25/2022, plaintiff shall file a letter clarifying which service provide it intends to subpoena. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 7/19/2022. (Gillespie-Cardo, Saudia)
July 12, 2022 Filing 7 First MOTION for Discovery Seeking Leave To Serve A Third Party Subpoena Prior To A Rule 26(f) Conference Subject to a Protective Order by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A -- Declaration of David Williamson, #3 Exhibit B -- Declaration of Patrick Paige, #4 Exhibit C -- Declaration of Susan Stalzer, #5 Proposed Order) (Atkin, John)
July 6, 2022 Filing 6 Notice of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or appeal Regarding a Copyright. (Attachments: #1 complaint, #2 Exhibit A) (Rocco, Christine)
July 6, 2022 Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 6, 2022 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 6, 2022 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Atkin, John)
July 6, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC Report on the filing or determination of an action or appeal regarding a copyright (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Atkin, John)
July 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.161.123.48 filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15719472 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Atkin, John)
July 6, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner and Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.161.123.48
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Represented By: John C. Atkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.161.123.48
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?