Dong v. Mayorkas et al
| Jin Dong |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, US Attorney General Merrick Garland and John Allen |
| 1:2022cv04062 |
| July 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to the above-captioned action, that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. So Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 7/29/22. (Piper, Francine)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice, Executed by the Parties by John Allen, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas (Speight, Melanie) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Melanie M. Speight on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Speight, Melanie) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and Electronic Service upon the US Attorneys Office re #1 Complaint, filed by Jin Dong. The United States Attorney, as attorney for defendants, is directed to show cause on or before 10/4/22, in writing, why a writ of mandamus should not be issued, and shall serve a copy of the response on plaintiff, with proof of such service to the Clerk of this Court. On or before 11/29/22, plaintiff shall file her reply, if any, with proof of service to the Clerk of this Court. Oral argument shall be heard on 12/8/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6F North before Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie. So Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 7/12/2022. Service made electronically via ECF. (Piper, Francine)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to John Allen, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Allen, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15736917 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Jin Dong. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Summons) (Chien, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
