Cyrus v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
| Odette K. Oliver Cyrus |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation, Mr. Duane Baldwin, Mr. Douglas Brown, Mr. Robert O. Brown, Mr. Kevin Calderara, Mr. Rahsaan Coefield, Esq., Ms. Kateri Cummings, Ms. Ellen Daly, Ms. Evelyn Dean, Ms. Fran Dillard, Ms. Linda Eddy, Mr. Roger Flanagan, Mr. John Franceschina, Ms. Courtney May Gillis, Ms. Christy Hilton, Mr. Chuck Kleinknecht, Ms. Rachael Liccion, Mr. Brian Loughlin, Mr. Sean Mongan, Ms. Katherine (Kathy) Montijo, Mr. Joe Morton, Mr. Joseph Picerno, Ms. Karen Sims and Ms. Celeste Urbank |
| 1:2022cv04115 |
| July 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Taryn A Merkl |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Summons Issued by clerk's office 8/17/22. (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
|
Filing 7
FILING FEE: $ 402.00 receipt number 28298191061 and 28298191072 (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The plaintiff's request to proceed IFP is denied without prejudice. Within 14 days of the entry of this order, to proceed with this action, the plaintiff must either file a Long Form IFP application for the Court's consideration, or pay the $402 filing fee. If the plaintiff fails to timely submit the Long Form IFP application or pay the filing fee, the action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to send the plaintiff a Long Form IFP application along with a copy of this order. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 8/16/2022. (Greene, Donna)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Odette K. Oliver Cyrus. (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
|
Filing 4
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Duane Baldwin, Douglas Brown, Robert O. Brown, Kevin Calderara, Rahsaan Coefield, Esq, Kateri Cummings, Ellen Daly, Evelyn Dean, Fran Dillard, Linda Eddy, Roger Flanagan, John Franceschina, Courtney May Gillis, Christy Hilton, Chuck Kleinknecht, Rachael Liccion, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Brian Loughlin, Sean Mongan, Katherine (Kathy) Montijo, Joe Morton, Joseph Picerno, Karen Sims, Celeste Urbank, filed by Odette K. Oliver Cyrus. (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
|
Filing 3
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. Document mailed. (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Odette K. Oliver Cyrus. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
