Aparicio v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Ayana E. Aparicio
Defendant: Uber Technologies Inc., John Doe and Louis Gangone
Case Number: 1:2022cv04244
Filed: July 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Sanket J Bulsara
Referring Judge: Pamela K Chen
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara: A telephonic-initial conference was held on 9/16/2022. Plaintiff's counsel ( Ronald Ramo) and Defendant's counsel (Joshua Stern) were present. As discussed on the record, the parties shall electronically file a proposed Rule 26(f) Report #12 by the close of business Monday 9/19/2022. The telephonic-initial conference is re-scheduled to 9/23/2022 at 2:30 P.M. before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the scheduled conference.So ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 9/16/2022. (AT&T Log #11:30-11:40.) (Manson, Eddie)
September 15, 2022 Filing 17 Letter to Magistrate Judge Bulsara Regarding Rule 26(f) Report by Uber Technologies Inc. (Stern, Joshua)
September 15, 2022 NOTICE REMINDER: The parties are directed to complete the attached Rule 26(f) plan worksheet #12 and electronically file same with the Court by the close of business today. (Manson, Eddie)
September 8, 2022 Filing 16 Letter (Cover Letter regarding Uber's Motion to Dismiss) by Uber Technologies Inc. (Stern, Joshua)
September 8, 2022 Filing 15 Letter Cover Letter for Motion by Ayana E. Aparicio (Ramo, Ronald)
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER: On 8/5/2022, the Court set a briefing schedule for Defendant's motion to dismiss and Plaintiff's motion to remand. According to that schedule, the parties were asked not to file their motion papers until the motion has been fully briefed on 10/20/2022. The parties were scheduled to serve on each other their respective opening briefs on 9/6/2022. The Court's schedule also directed parties to file as a letter on ECF (not as a motion) a copy of their cover letters "setting forth whom the movant represents and the papers being served." (8/5/2022 Order). The parties are hereby respectfully directed to file by 9/8/2022 the cover letters indicating that opening briefs have been served. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 9/7/2022. (Kim, Eliot)
August 5, 2022 Filing 14 Letter (Briefing Schedule) by Uber Technologies Inc. (Stern, Joshua)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER: Having reviewed Plaintiff's #9 Motion for Pre Motion Conference and the #13 letter in response submitted by Defendant Uber Technologies Inc. ("Uber"), the Court has determined a pre-motion conference is unnecessary. The Court now adopts the parties' proposed briefing schedule for Uber's motion to dismiss and Plaintiff's motion to remand: both motions to be served by 9/6/2022; opposition briefs to be served by 10/6/2022; and reply briefs to be served by 10/20/2022. As a courtesy to the Court, the parties are encouraged not to file their motion papers until the motion has been fully briefed. If the parties follow this practice, the motion and all supporting papers are to be served on the other party along with a cover letter setting forth whom the movant represents and the papers being served. On the day the papers are served, only a copy of the cover letter should be filed on the docket, as a letter, not as a motion. On the day the motion is fully briefed (i.e., 10/20/2022), each party shall electronically file its own moving papers on the docket. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 8/5/2022. (Kim, Eliot)
August 4, 2022 Filing 13 Letter (Pre-Motion Conference Opposition) by Uber Technologies Inc. (Stern, Joshua)
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic initial conference will be held at 11:30 A.M. on 9/16/2022 before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Rule 26(f) Report and electronically file same with the Court no later than 9/13/2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the Rule 26(f) Report, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. Upon receipt of this email counsel shall confirm with each other of the date and time of this telephonic initial conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 8/1/2022. (Manson, Eddie)
July 28, 2022 Filing 11 Summons Issued re #8 Amended Complaint as to Louis Gangone. (Lee, Tiffeny)
July 28, 2022 Filing 10 Proposed Summons. Re #8 Amended Complaint by Ayana E. Aparicio (Ramo, Ronald)
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER: In light of Plaintiff's #8 Amended Complaint and #9 letter motion for a pre-motion conference, the Court directs Defendant Uber Technologies Inc. ("Uber") to respond to Plaintiff's #9 letter by 8/4/2022. The Court will also adjourn the 8/1/2022 deadline for parties to submit a proposed briefing schedule with respect to Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss. Instead, by 8/5/2022, the parties shall jointly submit a letter with a proposed briefing schedule for both Defendant Uber's anticipated motion to dismiss and for Plaintiff's anticipated motion to remand. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 7/28/2022. (Kim, Eliot)
July 27, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for pre motion conference by Ayana E. Aparicio. (Ramo, Ronald)
July 27, 2022 Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT substituting Louis Gangone for John Doe against Uber Technologies Inc., Louis Gangone, filed by Ayana E. Aparicio. (Ramo, Ronald)
July 27, 2022 Filing 7 Letter in Opposition to Pre-Motion Conference Request by Uber Technologies, Inc., by Ayana E. Aparicio (Ramo, Ronald)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER: After reviewing Defendant's #5 letter motion for a Pre-Motion Conference and Plaintiff's #6 letter in response, the Court has determined that a pre-motion conference is unnecessary. Defendant's request is denied. The parties are instead directed to submit a joint proposed briefing schedule for Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss. The proposed briefing schedule should be submitted by 8/1/2022 as a letter filed on ECF. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 7/27/2022. (Kim, Eliot)
July 25, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald Salvatore Ramo on behalf of Ayana E. Aparicio (aty to be noticed) (Ramo, Ronald)
July 25, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for pre motion conference by Uber Technologies Inc.. (Stern, Joshua)
July 19, 2022 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 19, 2022 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 19, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Uber Technologies Inc. (Stern, Joshua)
July 19, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Uber Technologies Inc. from Supreme Court Kings County, case number 517094/2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15764012) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (Stern, Joshua)
July 19, 2022 This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 19, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aparicio v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ayana E. Aparicio
Represented By: Robert Yadgarov
Represented By: Ronald Salvatore Ramo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies Inc.
Represented By: Joshua Steven Stern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Louis Gangone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?